Trevor Aleo
@mraleosays
teacher | scholar | ENG & EDU lecturer | literary, critical, & postdigital #literacies
As someone invested in the public humanities, I really appreciated this call from Gerry Canavan’s chapter of “The Future of Totality.” I also want to stress the fact that one can advocate for leveraging new media while still fighting to protect our existing institutions! It’s not binary.
Thanks for the thoughtful response! I think you’re spot on. I’ve taught the Odyssey a few times but didn’t have a strong relationship with it, so I think that primed me to be more open/expectant of it being Nolan-fied. Totally fair to wish it had more pizazz. Did you ever see the miniseries? 😂
I hadn't encountered it either! Still reading, but so far its a great combination of thinking through ideas from his more recent publications & using them to think about how to cultivate a dialectical reading practice. As someone very interested in FJ & aesthetic education, this bit sold me. ⤵️
Me: Okay, Trevor. You’re banned from buying more books until you get through your backlog. Also me: But Fred…
Beat me to the punch! I’d been meaning to make a cheeky post praising it as the true masterpiece adaptation. 😅
You think you can just build a canon, brother!? You have to drive truck for a living to do that kind of work.
One thing that does my head about the #EduCogSci™️ movement’s obsession with scores (PISA, GCSE, NAEP, etc) is that people have stopped asking “Does this approach prepare students to actually DO science, history, English, etc.” & obsess over “does this approach raise our scores?” It’s actually crazy.
For context: This is the response a prominent ed reformer gave when I agreed with him that kids should engage with the canon, but pointed out his framing of why/how they should undertake that work was pretty reactionary. It ended with Nick & I getting blocked. 😅
As someone straddling the same institutional divides, this resonated. I’d also posit that both HS Eng & first year comp have both been savaged by the last few decades of skill-ification & would benefit equally from reconnecting with other humanistic disciplines AND drawing on Ss own literacies.
My go-to article on this. The authors articulate why disciplinary literacy is vital across the different content areas, but also offer a rationale explaining why previous attempts failed, what they got wrong, and why they (understandably) annoyed folks. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Me after a few beers talking to my normie dad friends about America: “Yeah, but like—I’d argue Trump isn’t a political aberration as much as he’s a symptom of a longer standing decline of American empire blah blah” Me after a few beers watching the #USMNT with my normie dad friends: “WOO AMURICA!!”
Some really cool final papers coming out of my world lit course! Favorite one so far attempted to use some excerpts from McGowan's "Universality & Identity Politics", Scott McCloud's writing on abstraction in comics, & Cesaire's "A Tempest" to make a universalist argument about art & literature.
I follow some brilliant ed policy folks on here who really need to help me out. Is the field THAT out of ideas or is this just a NYT reporting thing? Did everyone memory hole the entire ed-reform movement flop? The level of accountability era amnesia is *insane*. www.nytimes.com/2026/05/13/u...
Excited to share my dialogue with @afilreis.bsky.social about his phenomenal book & the ModPo course that inspired it. It’s a perfect follow up to my musings about how humanities Ts/scholars might take up digital tools while resisting EdTech™️! #literacies #edusky open.substack.com/pub/trevoral...
Oof. This is a rough read on multiple levels. If anything, I feel like the average T&L worker is much more likely to know names like Freire and Giroux than the average college professor? There’s also kind of an alarming number of “not x but y” constructions. Then this in the bio? 😬
Very excited to join @marcusluther.bsky.social & @thevogelman.bsky.social’s Bleak House book club! Made the very unnecessary purchase of the cloth bound edition—because books. Also, thrilled to see Terry Eagleton wrote the forward to this edition. Message them for details!
Equal parts funny & absurd that the rhetoric of CLT tests is “learning all that’s good beautiful & true” posturing, but the reality is it’s a mass produced standardized test made by a for-profit company that has longer excerpts and more questions per excerpt than the SAT & CLT. Oh, and older books.
Really appreciate how Tyson Lewis's work adds political and philosophical dimensions to modeling and think-alouds, two teaching practices central to #literacies approaches in the humanities. From "The Marxist Educational Logic of the Seminar."
Really enjoyed @afilreis.bsky.social’s “The Classroom & the Crowd!” Few books scratch my itch for progressive pedagogy, digital media, & literary studies at the same time the way this did. Highly recommend to the #literacies crew! Excited to share our podcast episode soon. @columbiaup.bsky.social
Thankfully our most august academic institutions are rising to the challenge and making their own public humanities programming! I mean, nothing says grass roots like a David Brooks lecture series @ Yale AND a weekly video podcast from The Atlantic. 🫠
Excited to present my session, "Pixels & Prose: Supporting Audiovisual Essay Composing" at the SSWCA conference on Saturday! As someone who's still (relatively) new to CT, I'm looking forward to connecting with more local educators/researchers in & beyond the @writingproject.bsky.social network.
Now does he feel his title Hang loose about him, like a giant’s robe Upon a dwarfish thief.
Appreciate the reporting! 🫡 Even as someone who researches the intersection of tech, education, & youth culture, I didn’t realize how bad it was. It inspired me to build a whole unit focused on equipping my undergrads with the tools to interrogate & critique the whole moral panic tech discourse.
Is some intrepid, gumshoe journalist going to make a podcast about what a scandal this is? Or are they all too busy delivering keynotes, writing ed policy, or “selling a story” to curriculum companies?