Acfusion
@acfusion
Artist & Mecha enjoyer
I'm sorry but the fact godot is open find AI assisted contributions is a part of the problemm we shoudn't be excused in anyway. AI assisted assets are just as much as a problem as ones that's generated entirely especially in the context of the current state of Gen AI.
The thing is that while Godot isn't outright pro-AI the fact they still allow AI gen code in the first place under any reason is enough of a red flag to me. As soon you start allowing it is going to snowball what ever you like it or not.
Not to mention when I mean the windows I mean the ones in the gap between the sign like you see in the model there. You can clearly see windows on top in the model version but it was omitted & have this random patch in the image.
A photoshop filter wouldn't do this. it wouldn't added in details that weren't there in the original design suck as the fucked up smearing on the base level building on top of the gap where there should be windows. Same issues show up with the clock tower.
My bad in terms of that, but even if we assume that would be the case there's still a lot constant smearing & random details on the that doesn't even exist on the tower if you compare the model & 2D image. I'm sorry I just but I think there are more red flags in a lot of aspects of this box art.
By the way the title is clickbait BS here what he actually said & it's far from what the title suggest.
The funny part of all this is there is already a video title & thumbnail that's pretty much this.
@roadietripp.bsky.social go ahead and tell me what your defense for shit like this ? Being autistic & trans doesn't give you the asshole card and it certainly doesn't give her the right to act like she's innocent & meanwhile acting like a snake.
That's nothing to do with references.The problem is that they were doing this along with every other evidence. There's already Image 2 Image software on top of Gen Ai model can & has produced work that is simlar to existing works.
You can't say it's nonsense when that's kinda of the point. People will assume it makes no sense and that it's not generated because the amount of layers shown they had already been caught before on top of that. Scamers like them doing what they can to muddy up the waters. x.com/kariha_moon5...
It did about as well as most previous metroid had performed sales wise so I'll never get why people took it as selling over a million a bad sign.
First off this is false it's been shown that images in the dataset do become apart of the model and has been shown they can produce images that were part of the dataset. Also it's not copyright maximalist to expect to have some form of consent or permision. spectrum.ieee.org/midjourney-c...
That's also false there's no such thing as a model that is competely trained off their own model. Large companies weren't able to do this. Not to mention it's trained under art that was stolen online via pretraining it. futurism.com/artificial-i...
Also giving your data to ChatGPT is stil using other people's work as training data sincet ChatGPT is built on top of data that was scraped online. A functional model will not happen as long you need a so much data for it to work from scratch.
No the article mentions it's not the only problem and is making it worse. It literally explains how the water is used. Again this you trying hard to discredit it some from trying to assume it was clickbait to persuming everyone in the article is lying.
They are using a model built on stolen works that's only fine tuned and can't be seen as okay.
Here's a statement from the people behind both Glaze & Nightshade about the recent devlopment.
Can you actually read ? They used Gen AI during devlopment. Even assuming if all the placeholder textures are all gone that still marks for disqualification since they still used it.
No they didn't they were up front since the start No Gen AI used during devlopment. It's literally apart of the FAQ unless you going to tell me they edit it at last second then give me some proof otherwise you are just digging your heels over nothing.
Mainly want to mention this because I often seen people say they trained using their own work when questioning the image models they used.
Give a source on that & even that were true once again you being this guy and that isn't a good arugement point.
Hey I'm an Artist here & code mystics was wrong about generated assets not being used. I already checked both files & the cabnet one is obviously had either AI assets or used an Gen AI tool on top of the draft they posted. 1/X
Fair warning they achivements do use generated assets I already check the files. They either lying or being lied too.