Bennett
@bennettmcintosh
Science & Technology Studies | History of Sci & Tech || How do data & scientific communities make each other? Current projects on: social genomics; environmental regulation
Why are you spouting Republican propaganda that is designed to make my governor a J6 supporter and anti-choice radical rather than a guy who's running on universal healthcare and overturning some of the worst anti-union legislation in the country www.crowleyforwi.com/data-centers
The ESPN profile of Sean Payton a while back shows this really well. Even the guy who nominally runs the machine and intentionally makes the machine even more convoluted and inhuman does that in part by making himself its meat puppet www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/...
Wow, the OMB/NSF's attempt to eliminate the National Center for Atmospheric Research (among many other cuts to CO) sure seems to not just be climate denial but part of a coordinated effort to punish CO for convicting Tina Peters of tampering with voting machines www.denverpost.com/2026/08/14/c...
I think that 30pp should be discounted somewhat, seems like a lot of late-deciders broke for Crowley. The polls' numbers were ok-ish, but the headlines had the wrong interpretation b/c "Hong leads" wrongly implies that the undecideds look like the decideds. law.marquette.edu/poll/2026/07...
fwiw, in the US House primary here, the anti-incumbent got half that. Pocan is probably a lot more popular hereabouts, but that's kinda the point. elections.countyofdane.com/Election-Res...
thank u to @sabs.bsky.social for, among other things, mentioning the giraffe weevil, who is a great Little Guy to know about defector.com/theres-big-n...
Gonna ask you the question on everybody's lips (I don't have a good answer either way myself) www.vox.com/politics/496...
"The modern soybean is one of the world’s miracle technologies, capable of cheaply, efficiently, and healthfully feeding billions of people. But, unfortunately, we’ve mostly chosen to squander it on the most destructive purposes possible." ~ @mbolotnikova.bsky.social 🎁 www.vox.com/future-perfe...
Really compelled by @mnolangray.bsky.social 's argument here that Zoning is not only often unproductive in itself, but has taken Planning departments' attention away from what they should be doing to guide growth
Timing probably depends on traffic, but busses drop off at the departures gates, so the van Galder=>L transfer was the quickest in the entire itinerary. Plus, vegan food at Union Station is slim pickings, so the L gave me more flexibility & a chance to enjoy the city a bit during my transfer. YMMV!
I get that reporting standards can be vague but I doubt that this is just a statistical artifact captimes.com/news/public-...
I thought this tidbit from a linked article -- that when Obama agencies raised their various VSLs in 2011, the Chamber of Commerce suddenly pivoted back to "eh actually these are incommensurate, let Congress decide" -- was compelling www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/b...
It is ever cheaper & easier to produce new science undermining key regulations. Technical/"objective" signals of merit don't prevent this, and relying on social signals like funding source breeds resentment (and, as reanalysis becomes cheaper/easier, they may grow less reliable too)
In v2 of our preprint on "Adversarial Reanalysis," Kelsey Ichikawa, @nicolecnelson.bsky.social, & added our take on Gold Standard Science as an example of how #OpenData challenges science's existing tools for self-governance osf.io/preprints/me... #sts #metascience
It's awkward phrasing, but I don't read this as barring anything that *isn't* education/advocacy/support, so much as saying that those explicitly *will* be allowed, even in forms that might otherwise violate other rules. But possible that I (& bsky!) have not thought through how this could go wrong!
Doomers, who treat super-intelligent AI as likely and threatening, treat intelligent as almost a magic power, but it's much more heterogeneous, spiky (and, I would add relational) than that; But the AI-as-Normal-Tech argument seems naive about the incentives to use risky AI in, e.g., Mil Tech
I still think about this (from 2018!) regularly. So many people reaching seeking solace from the "privilege of an apocalypse" proteanmag.com/2018/12/11/n...
Still better than dairy milk on basically every metric, and the good news is that there are even better options -- soy milk is high-protein, low impact, and delicious; imo The King of Milks ourworldindata.org/environmenta...
BTW you probably aren't allergic to penicillin, and if your chart says you are, ask your doc about delabeling for your own sake and the sake of antibiotic stewardship. Test might be 1hr; $0 out-of-pocket Helps everyone if front-line antibiotics are available! onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
INWORKS data availability statement from their most recent pub: www.bmj.com/content/382/...
Follow up: in another EO on Friday, the White House apparently ordered the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reconsider the Linear No Threshold dose response model discussed in our paper, at least in regards to radiation www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Such science – even in less-partisan contexts – can be difficult & time-consuming to adjudicate properly. There's no objectively best analytical decision, & reputational markers are imperfect at best & counterproductive at worst. We don't have a lot of solutions, but hoping this prompts discussion!
Anyway, we see these political actions -- subpoenas, legislation, regulations -- as continuous with attempts by folks we call "dissident scientists" to gain access to regulatory data. They were often stymied by data holders, but when they did gain access they did do and publish science on these data
As @danhicks.bsky.social notes, this order has a lot of continuity with the Pruitt/Wheeler EPA's "Strengthening Transparency" rules – and we trace that history back as well to legislation aimed at "secret science" in the early 2010s and to attempts as early as the 1990s to access regulatory data