cameron tonkinwise
@camerontw
transition design, service design, design philosophy, finitude most of my occasional thinking these days takes advantage of the slightly longer form afforded by the truly awful linkedin, sorry:
appears to have been promoting her company while testifying: www.linkedin.com/posts/tdiese...
A data point about what it is like working at a university at the moment. These are the workshops Central is advertising via an email sent to every academic at my institution:
You can apparently fool most of the people most of the time, especially stock market gambling addicts www.sbs.com.au/news/article...
If you know what this note to myself found on my desk means, please drop me a line. Also, how my handwriting has degraded...
Here is the intellectual giganticism of the Minister for Science Technology and the Digital Economy in my so-called nation - from this Gwyneth Paltrow vibed speech: www.minister.industry.gov.au/ministers/ch...
nothing says we don't really care like AI-slopping your political campaign
"a temporary liberal consensus that dissolves on contact with air" youtu.be/id2SNd6HnC8?...
A couple of decades later they collaborated, but worth remembering how legitimately pissed off Derrida was with Habermas' utterly hypocritical early dismissal of Derrida's work - from "Afterword" in the book version of _Limited Inc_
And then of course the whole 'let's fk with library catalogue metadata' is capitalized upon by some gestural environmental politics that registers 'NATURE' as an artist to collect negligible Spotify payments. FFS
Infuriating when large businesses are this bad at their core business. Penguin Cafe Orchestra have a piece of music based on a 'traditional' tune, so Spotify offers other music by the artist 'traditional' because who-the-f-cares.
Fujitsu to its customers: "whatever - at least we are not lying to you"
The response from the unprincipled cowards who now run a Nazi bar.
I'd actually just settle for insight into the Business Model: sufficient revenue from university library purchases despite those universities also subscribing to 'we must actually help students use AI because it is the future'?
There is some solace in the fact that if you are going to stick AI-Slop into your (pre-print) academic paper, you are required to reference the infantile name that some techbro has given their image regurgitation machine... Nano Banana, FFS
"Don't make me think" was a dangerous slogan when the 'me' was 'users,' but now the 'me' seems to be 'designers.' What do these people think thinking is and why do they hate doing it?
I have for the very first time in my life intentionally attempted to use a genAI system, and the result was far from intelligent
A blogpost I just found. FFS. genAI = inauthentic the they idle chatter! (& why does anyone do this: "here's what the TV said when I turned it on." "here's a quote from a random page of a book." "here's a song lyric." "here's the result of me clicking the middle word option suggested by Siri.")
A designer posted this and all I can see is the pile of short-life things people put on the kerb on household bulky waste clean-up day. A career in landfill.
Use AI to make traffic elsewhere - or, you know, you could take active/public transport
Change Radio to GenAI in this Brecht polemic: www.nyklewicz.com/brecht.html
The Design Team at @microsoft.com: do we care? we do not - let the shitshow continue