You have to maintain that population genetics doesn’t really matter for the study of evolution and can be replaced by naïve adaptationist intuition. E.g.: 28/34

This figure from the first installment of his series on genetics and free will is a good indicator of Morris’ grasp of biology. Entomologists will find the counts of the tarsal segments on what he tries to pass off for a beetle all kinds of entertaining.

Werner Herzog

And the reign of error continues...

This is more or less what talking to an evolutionary psychologist feels like 80% of the time.

Maybe they didn't cite Piffer because of things like this: Here is the entire methods section for his paper "Intelligence Trends in Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of Roman Polygenic Scores." That's it. The whole thing.

🧪🧬 Today is the observation of Frederick Douglass' chosen birthday. I say "chosen" because he was robbed of the knowledge of the exact date of his birth by those who enslaved him. Today is a good day to read his 1854 commencement address to Western Reserve College.1/2 tile.loc.gov/storage-serv...

🧪🦴🦷🧬🐭🐒 Reviewer 2, I don't know who you are, but thankyouthankyouthankyou for giving me the opportunity to put this reference into my paper.

Don't forget the rigor of his use of imagery in visualizing biological variation.

Here's mine:

TPUSA and Charlie Kirk were in my town a little while back. His minions had a large size beach ball out on the quad that they were calling the "Free Speech Ball" and they were inviting people to write anything on it. I obliged them. And Steve Sailer wouldn't last 10 min against me.

And did I ever show this to you?

And this is a GPP. Note that, while proportionally smaller, Greenland is squished beyond recognition from north to south areas near the equator are comically stretched out along the same orientation (by strebe en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ga...) 5/15 upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...

Harold II took an arrow to the eye in battle. He died. Harold the Orange and Stripey is made of sterner stuff.