Cat Hicks
@grimalkina
Author of The Psychology of Software Teams: she/her 🏳️🌈 Catharsis: Host at:
The handout from this skill is very long, but it includes a mini lit review, the DOIs of sources, search terms, evidence red flags (e.g., retrospective studies, lack of long-term data as in the case of this particular regime, it's new). Also proposing scenarios to look into
Now, it's going to create a lit review using things like my Pubmed connector. It will even tell me what search terms it uses so I can go use them, because that's also something I wanted in my harness. You will notice links and flags -- all from my skill instructions
I won't show you all the demographic back and forth, but I'll show you just how easy it is to make an AI-administered survey good, even with the stupid AI tone ("honest" lol), you can dramatically improve LLM output with a good harness Here are inventory instructions: github.com/DrCatHicks/i...
An example of me working the problem is in the informed-patient skill I wrote. I will continue with this very serious example, and give you a different user you might not believe in, someone pretty skilled with evidence. I wrote this query the way *I* would write it, into *my* evidence harness
Here is google with AI stripped out of the query. It is, obviously, still doing a lot of text processing and scaffolding behind the scenes, and it also makes this link. But this is what it feels like to just see a sea of links while panicking about your loved one. You tell me: is this better?
Let's use a chemo example. Now, this is opening up browser version of claude that is stripped of all my harness -- and my harness is GOOD, forces lots of literature review checking and explicit source, so you're seeing the worst version. There are issues - you don't know what it's "read" really
you tell me which seems to be doing the best job with tossing up elements of the information space
Two of my favorite beings This has been a wild month, between big joys like my book coming out, but also crisis as we needed to triage and respond to health challenges for me (thankfully I am stabilized and we hope 🤞 ok now but healing from a period of pretty immense pain) and hard family news.
This is why I wrote "in California" in the next reply! Here's the wall in an exam room I was in recently
well in nyt they say "many previous studies" find it a "reliable proxy for narcissism" and link this journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1... which says this
When you're hanging out with tech friends in San Francisco and you need to interpret the headlines for them and talk about the differences between observational causal inference and designed experiments and the math pitfalls of each and all you have for paper is a verve bag
the social identity theory psychologist in me jumped OUT when I saw this in my headphones Espresso started Magic moment
they highlight some national diffs like this that I'm really curious about
Coming for you, Toronto!! Looking forward to giving my CTO Craft con keynote which is about measurement AFTER you've messed up: improving how carefully you work towards evidence, stopping the ad hoc metrics chaos, and repairing your organization's ability to learn from itself
god dammit now I feel like I have to learn to understand this commit hook stuff
Perhaps you have thought to yourself, *I'm* on board the Psychology of Software Teams train, but how can I identify fellow POST fans in the wild?? Well if you find me at a 2026 conference or book reading you can get a TINY PROPAGANDA STICKER
I was really pleased with the xwing harness referential I did while still making this a non-costume/fashion version! I knew I didn't want to wear a whole vest (it is warm in San Diego in July)
Perfect rec as I am already a fan enough to put a quote from it at the top of one of the pieces of writing I did that meant the most to me! :) osf.io/preprints/ps...
uh oh I am hearing there are even feminist studies of Bell Labs re: the telephone www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt...