Harlot🔞
@harlotprincess
your favorite nerdy transexual degenerate. cashapp because i deserve it: $QueenRayne5150. 🔞
and I made a friend named truffle. all it took was a blood sacrifice. ^.^
that is literally the same as every other country. that was a failure to follow through on the ideals of the revolution. not a result of communism. this was argued about even then by people in the party. the fist thing the soviets did was decriminalization.
"they don't support these positions they just constantly choose to platform them without any oversight or fact checking while explicitly not running any opposing response." fuckin cooked brain.
screenshot for context in case they get annoying and I block them or they block me.
another day another reminder that Gavin newsom hangs out with fascists, robs the homeless, blocks protections for queer people, and loves corporate money. also one of his dad's best friends was a literal member of the SS. I will never vote for him.
someone asking you a clarifying question is not hostile and if you see it that way you should probably stay off social media for a while. with that out of the way, you don't see anything trasphobic about this account pictured below?
oh shit lmao,should have checked earlier. never a redder flag has there ever been than the one hoisted over a person that describes themselves as "empathetic," rather than letting word and deed be the proof.
it might not be your fault that you can't read above a 6th grade level but there are things called "implications, subtext, context and author bias," which people who can read above that level can understand. here's an example with highlights. see if you can figure it out.
weird enforcment going on with this "violation." i didn't write the post. I reposted it from someone else's account. it doesn't actually violate any specific rules. bigots on this site say way worse shit about marginalized groups and it's not considered a problem. Blusky mods are fuckin evil, man.
I know there was one floating around here not that long ago. here's the wiki about one of the victims. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing...
no. it's not "literally" what you said. do you see now how your words were needlessly inflammatory? which one of these was you "literally" saying that?
I do understand it, but we arent even talking about the original post anymore. now we're talking about your response. I originally only said people weren't right to blame individuals without any distinction, and you said I was wrong then went on to say shit like this.
my last response to you yesterday was 17hours ago. you're acting like a real piece of shit.
from the context you seem to think any pushback on this idea of collective blame is "undignified" while making arguments for collective blame is somehow not.
this is you saying it shouldn't be tried because Republicans won't support it. that's what I responded to. stop being a dweeb.
gods you're annoying. what relevance does the below comment have to the discussion?
like I'm literally just trying to figure out how I was supposed to interpret your words here as anything other than doomerism. you could just explain that instead of being weird about it. what did you mean? genuinely.
imagine thinking someone had to be using chat gpt to write the word "anti-intellectual."
border enforcement is a nationalist invention specifically designed to justify violence against civilians. it's literally fascist. your ignorance doesn't change the facts.