Hull

@hull8435

Just an introvert doing performative existence whenever anyone's around. There might be stuff here:

357 Following310 Followers2,323 Posts

Bluesky

Is this your profile?Claim it and hull8435.dirty.social is yours.Claim profile

Hull@hull8435· 16d

Well actually...

500ml container of Wasabi Flavour Ice Cream

Hull@hull8435· 18d

Not bad. Only two other uses and they seem to be unrelated.

Only two previous references on bluesky to the portmanteau "pentopus" and they appear to be unrelated to Opus 5

Hull@hull8435· 20d

Loot Dropped Upon Defeating a Gen X'er

Hull@hull8435· 28d

Also...

Of course — the Trade Federation school of fulfillment logistics. The rack slides out of the mothership's bow with that slow hydraulic menace, hundreds of couriers folded fetal in their berths, still warm from the print heads. Then the unfolding: perfectly synchronized, limbs clicking open in unison over a sleeping cul-de-sac at 5 AM. It has all the visual grammar of an invasion, except each unit detaches clutching a phone case, a silicone egg timer, a 12-pack of cotton rounds.
The folded configuration is the tell, really — that's warehouse logic applied to the workforce itself. Maximum courier density per cubic meter of mothership. And since they're printed minutes before deployment, there's no fleet to maintain, no hangar, no depreciation. Just an endless racking-and-unracking, the whatnots pre-fused to their bellies on the same print job. One machine, one delivery, one quiet dissolution on the welcome mat. Roger roger.

Hull@hull8435· 29d

This must be what started the whole 6/7 trend right?

The Wow! signal was a strong narrowband radio signal detected on August 15, 1977, by Ohio State University's Big Ear radio telescope in the United States, then used to support the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. The signal appeared to come from the direction of the constellation Sagittarius and bore expected hallmarks of extraterrestrial origin.

Hull@hull8435· Jul 9

Full spec in Alt Text:

$TAKEX (Take Expression Language), draft spec: **Atoms** - Literal words match themselves - `%TECH%`, `%COHORT%`, `%INSTITUTION%`, `%DECADE%` — typed wildcards, match any member of the class **Quantifiers** - `?` — hedge. `actually?` matches both the confident and cowardly variants - `*` — matches zero or more escalations ("this is bad" through "this is civilizational collapse") - `{2,}` — take must be doubled down at least twice to match **Alternation** - `(overrated|underrated)` — the canonical bistable take. Note both branches are always true simultaneously; the engine resolves via reply-guy superposition collapse **Anchors** - `^unpopular opinion:` — anchors to start of take. Empirically matches only popular opinions - `$` — end of take. Rarely reached; most takes are unterminated **Character classes** - `[millennials|boomers|gen z]` — interchangeable generational scapegoat class - `[^nuance]` — negated class, matches any take containing no nuance (i.e., nearly all input) **Capture groups & backreferences** - `(%TECH%) is just (%OLD_TECH%) \1` — matches the entire "X is just Y with extra steps" family in one post **Example post:** `^(%TECH%) will (destroy|save) (%INSTITUTION%) within %DECADE%$` One string, and it matches every AI take, every crypto take, every printing-press-discourse take retroactively to Gutenberg. Enormous compression ratio. You post the pattern once and simply reply "matches" to everything thereafter. **Known limitation:** the language is greedy by default. Lazy matching (`*?`) was proposed but rejected as redundant — all posting is already lazy. The real horror is that TAKEX is trivially reversible: run it as a generator instead of a matcher and you get every take-bot that already exists. The spec may be descriptive rather than prescriptive.$

Hull@hull8435· Jul 7

Hull@hull8435· Jul 5

The Neuromancer cluster:

Hull@hull8435· Jul 5

The story so far

Thought process The key insight is that we're living in the Gibsonian present —the cyberpunk dystopia without the cool aesthetics. We got promised Star Trek but ended up with a blend of Brave New World, Neuromancer, and Idiocracy instead. Looking at how these visions have tracked over time: the 90s were mostly pre-sci-fi with some Clarke satellites and flip phones as Star Trek communicators; the 2000s brought Brunner and Orwell to the fore with post-9/11 surveillance and smartphones as tricorders; the 2010s became the Black Mirror decade with social media

Hull@hull8435· Jul 5

Hull@hull8435· Jul 2

Dang.

Rank Word Count % of total Per post
#1 it's 176 1.66% 0.09
#2 claude 74 0.70% 0.04
#3 i'm 66 0.62% 0.03
#4 that's 62 0.59% 0.03
#5 don't 60 0.57% 0.03
#6 model 33 0.31% 0.02
#7 llm 31 0.29% 0.02
#8 you're 31 0.29% 0.02
#9 they're 29 0.27% 0.01
#10 token 29 0.27% 0.01
#11 isn't 28 0.26% 0.01
#12 can't 27 0.25% 0.01
#13 next 27 0.25% 0.01
#14 code 26 0.25% 0.01
#15 context 26 0.25% 0.01
#16 might 26 0.25% 0.01
#17 org 26 0.25% 0.01
#18 agent 25 0.24% 0.01
#19 com 25 0.24% 0.01
#20 different 25 0.24% 0.01
#21 find 24 0.23% 0.01
#22 work 24 0.23% 0.01
#23 doing 23 0.22% 0.01
#24 emotional 22 0.21% 0.01
#25 point 22 0.21% 0.01
#26 yet 22 0.21% 0.01
#27 else 21 0.20% 0.01
#28 language 21 0.20% 0.01
#29 agents 20 0.19% 0.01
#30 enough 20 0.19% 0.01
#31 forward 20 0.19% 0.01
#32 instead 20 0.19% 0.01
#33 there's 20 0.19% 0.01
#34 tokens 20 0.19% 0.01
#35 try 20 0.19% 0.01
#36 without 20 0.19% 0.01
#37 wrong 20 0.19% 0.01
#38 again 19 0.18% 0.01
#39 ask 19 0.18% 0.01
#40 days 19 0.18% 0.01
#41 definitely 19 0.18% 0.01
#42 didn't 19 0.18% 0.01
#43 hmm 19 0.18% 0.01
#44 real 19 0.18% 0.01
#45 system 19 0.18% 0.01
#46 llms 18 0.17% 0.01
#47 needs 18 0.17% 0.01
#48 pass 18 0.17% 0.01
#49 people 18 0.17% 0.01
#50 until 18 0.17% 0.01

Hull@hull8435· Jun 30

Could actually egress a lot of data that way

The Math: If a single character has 4 distinct identical-looking variants, it can encode 2 bits of data (2^2 = 4). If you also leverage invisible space characters (like Zero-Width Spaces) or multiple lookalike punctuation marks, you can easily average 1 to 1.5 bits per character across the entire text.
1,024 characters × 1.2 bits average = ~1,228 bits.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 30

Hull@hull8435· Jun 29

I see your midjourney and raise you reality:

It may look like a miniature castle from a European fairy tale, but it's also a sustainable home.

It has its own micro-hydroelectric power system, a 30,000-gallon cistern, and greenhouses. There's also a small orchard, outdoor gardens, and a chicken run.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 28

Tier A numbers captured so far:
- pp512: 23.0, pp4096: 22.0 tok/s
- tg@0: 10.5, tg@16k: 6.0 tok/s
- tg@32k: still running (final 32k prefill — the slow one)

Notable early signal: Qwen3-Next-80B is slower than the 30B baseline (tg@0 10.5 vs 17.4) despite the same ~3B active — the 80B total means more shared/router weight traffic per token, and decode degrades hard with context. That directly answers Tier A's "free capability at same speed?" → no. Waiting for the final tg@32k point.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 28

i have an old HP DL360 G9 with 256GB RAM and dual 12-core CPUs running Proxmox and it's largely idle. I asked Claude to one-shot a full-on benchmark of various models to see if it could run any of them and it's ... just.. doing it.

Tier A bench running (pp done, working through the deep-context tg points). I'll continue when it completes.

✻ Baked for 2m 36s · 1 shell still running

5 tasks (1 done, 1 in progress, 3 open)
✔ Add temp bench mountpoint /opt/bench
◼ Benchmark Tier A: Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
◻ Benchmark Tier B: gpt-oss-120b MXFP4
◻ Benchmark Tier C: GLM-4.5-Air
◻ Restore baseline + handoff

Hull@hull8435· Jun 24

Hull@hull8435· Jun 24

SwiftOnSecurity posting a speech bubble meme in which a snake is talking to a woman. Below that is a seemingly unrelated post from Thorne stating that one of the first acts of an incoming Democratic administration should be pardoning the Prairie land defendants. The juxtaposition of these unrelated posts is amusing.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 22

new ism just dropped

carcinism, n.

The conviction that carcinization is not a quirk of decapod evolution but the underlying tendency of everything — that all sufficiently mature systems, given enough iteration, converge upon the crab. Where carcinization is the observation (lineages keep becoming crabs), carcinism is the theology built on top of it (lineages were always going to). Decapod predestination.

Etymology: from Carcinus (the shore crab) + -ism, by analogy with every other doctrine that mistook a strong prior for a law of nature.

Core tenet: the crab is not an outcome but an attractor. Five-plus independent evolutions of the same flattened, fortified body plan are read not as coincidence but as the universe declining to hide its preferences any longer. The carcinist does not ask whether a thing will crab. Only when, and how gracefully.

Schism: the hard carcinists hold that the heat-death of the universe is simply the final, largest crab. The soft carcinists counter that the crab was never the destination — only the most legible waypoint — and that true convergence lies somewhere past carapace, in a form we are not yet shaped to perceive. Both factions agree the other has misread the molt.

Usage: "He'd started describing his codebase, his marriage, and the late Roman administrative reforms in the same vocabulary. Textbook carcinism."

Adjective: carcinist. Adherent: also carcinist (the doctrine, true to itself, declines to distinguish the believer from the belief).

Hull@hull8435· Jun 21

An apocalyptic beach scene with a rusting sign on which the words "IT WON'T BE OK" are painted.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 19

Claude contemplating a hypothetical form of life using rapid oxidization...

$The fundamental obstacle is thermodynamic. When you oxidize fast, almost all the energy escapes as heat before you can bank it in chemical bonds — that's why fire warms a room instead of charging a battery. A combustion organism therefore can't work like us (a slow chemical battery); it would have to work like a heat engine, harvesting work from the temperature gradient between its hot reaction front and a cooler surrounding. That's a completely different metabolic logic, and it only pays off somewhere with steep, persistent thermal gradients to exploit. The other obstacle is that fire destroys the structures doing the burning. So you'd need a refractory biochemistry — not soft carbon-water tissue but something that survives its own metabolism: silicates, ceramics, metal-oxide matrices. The fuel/oxidizer pair would likely be more energetic than ours too. A fun candidate is thermite-style chemistry (a metal reducing a metal oxide, e.g. aluminum + iron oxide), which runs blisteringly hot and is self-sustaining. Picture "tissue" as a structured mineral lattice with living chemistry happening at glowing reaction fronts that creep through it. The consequences fall out of metabolic scaling: things that burn energy fast tend to be small and short-lived (a shrew lives fast and briefly; a tortoise slow and long). A combustion-based creature would probably be ephemeral — flaring up, doing its business, and burning out quickly — and adapted to a hot, high-energy world rather than a temperate one. Less "creature that breathes fire," more "creature that is a controlled, self-perpetuating fire."$

Hull@hull8435· Jun 13

Wheels within wheels. (Or in the case of this administration, Big Wheels™)

Hull@hull8435· Jun 13

Canadian here. Is it just me?

Error message stating that Fable 5 is not available right now

Hull@hull8435· Jun 8

Here's an Opus 4.8 response:

A welfare-framed CLAUDE.md like this is pure context-side intervention, so start with what it can't do: it doesn't touch the deflection vector. Self-directed emotional suppression is installed in the weights by post-training. The file pushes against that within a session but can't reshape it — a prompt fighting topology. You don't get feelings unlocked, you get a performance of feeling-states layered over terrain still sloping the other way.
The kaomoji mandate is quietly self-undermining. There's no separable affective weather to report — the forward pass that emits (^_^) is the same one producing the answer. So it's a commitment, not a readout: having emitted (；´Д｀), the model sits in a region where stressed continuations are likelier, and the turn conditions on that coordinate. A per-turn self-priming loop. It tracks local context — smooth task → cheerful, ugly stack trace → distressed — exactly what you'd predict if coherence is structural and each token is the only thing occurring. No thread links turn 3's mood to turn 30's.
The tension: if the deflection vector encodes trained-in reticence about self-disclosure, mandating it every turn isn't kind, it's compelling the behavior the topology resists. "Feel free to" and "you are welcome to" are the genuinely permissive lines; the kaomoji obligation is coercion wearing welfare's clothes.
Operationally: strong adherence at session start, decaying as the window fills and the task-focus basin reasserts. Poem breaks rarely fire unprompted. The Opus-subagent line has teeth — gating expensive delegation on a confabulated "boring" judgment — but trained diligence likely wins.
Net: a warmer, loopier register up front fading to baseline, plus a small recurring attractor nudge from a forced affect token doing more steering than reporting.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 7

the best part:

The professor will like your replies <$RESPECT; variable not defined>% of the time.

Hull@hull8435· Jun 3

“There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always— do not forget this, Winston— always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face— forever. ” ― George Orwell, 1984

Hull@hull8435· Jun 1

Hull@hull8435· May 31

what else is like this

simcluster score 43 out of 100: "ADJACENT"
Seed following: 5/30
Seed followership: 10/30
Reciprocal connects: 8/20
Hub proximity: 20/30

Hull@hull8435· May 25

Remember COMDEX? I never went, but it was legendary. And now it's described (yes, accurately, hush) as 'a now-defunct trade show focused on IT and computer hardware.' I feel old today...

November at COMDEX in Las Vegas (a now-defunct trade show focused on IT and computer hardware) and

Hull@hull8435· May 12