Jacob Romanow
@jakeromanow
ars longa, vita brevis
The best Pride & Prejudice adaptation: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...
Delacroix, "Don Quixote in his Library" upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...
"While Penn ultimately rejected the compact…the university has already adopted many of its proposals…the climate of fear [has] many opting to avoid engaging in controversial or left-coded material." newrepublic.com/article/2100...
I agree that there's a functionalism to genre categories, and also that the idea that some texts are non- or supra-generic is mostly ideological. But every classification is also ideological and I think it's a mistake to neutralize that. This list put Joanna Russ on my mind:
Imagine breaking into a building with this in it and heisting a Renoir instead, smdh
Victorian Network's special issue "Victorian Pedagogy" is out today, including my article "The Moralist Critic and the Student Activist: A Reconsideration"! www.victoriannetwork.org/index.php/vn...
People present canons as fixed precisely as a rearguard maneuver for their own candidates. So it's worth noticing the vibe shift here vs eg this post from 2021. The right-wing fantasized continuity of canon in 2025 looks more masculinist + imperialist, less pastoralist, and much less Catholic.
I'm skeptical of the premise that this article paints a radically different picture of what's going on. The screenshot aside ("I'm using an AI process to write a textbook and then assigning it" is...whatever), the core issues—claims about in-class work, "replicability," the screenshot below—hold.
No love for the guy but this sequence of titles is absolutely stunning:
Two things that give off the same energy etc, taking no questions at this time