Kevin
@kmichaelwilson
Historical Chinese literature, poetry, and philosophy. Co-host Rereading the Stone podcast book reviews & discussion of Ming-Qing literature, science fiction, etc.
pooh-poohing one of most obviously good and righteous moments of the French Revolution tell us more, professor smooth brain
look, just because it's a 1930s Chinese novel by Zhang Henshui 张恨水 (Fate in Tears and Laughter 啼笑因緣) doesn't mean we can't *assemble a crew* everyone who's anyone is here: ✔️ "Quick-knife Zhou" 快刀周 ✔️ "Pockmarked Jiang" 麻子江 ✔️ "Baldy Wang" 王二秃子
this, and *not* Stephen King, is peak performance for a writer: 🌸 wrote a few works, but certainly didn't "write every day;" led a full life, full of non-writerly experiences 🌺 never made any money from it 🌸 highly educated 🪷 thinly-veiled personal obsessions/ fetishes ("skin in the game")
when you learn Classical Chinese, they usually fail to mention that, as a bonus, you'll also be able to read the most significant poem in Vietnamese literature
getting extremely strong dream vibes off Tale of Jin, Yun, and Qiao 金雲翹傳 (17th C.), these levels are off-the-charts maybe the most HLM-pilled caizi jiaren novel I've yet encountered; 0% chance Cao didn't read this one
provocative gum-feeding scene that I wasn't expected from a 1930s Chinese novel (Fate in Tears and Laughter 啼笑因緣 by Zhang Henshui 张恨水) (see ALT)
Fate in Tears and Laughter 啼笑因緣 (1930), by Zhang Henshui 张恨水 A Lady Awakened (2011), by Cecilia Grant Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation (1993), by John Guillory Tian dao 天道 (2008) (tv show) 2/2
"Because I think about it a lot," says OP who clearly has never even googled this topic, let alone thought about it in any meaningful capacity
who up reading Chapter 5 of John Guillory's Cultural Capital, "Chapter Five: The Discourse of Value: From Adam Smith to Barbara Herrnstein Smith"
What's this, why, it's a physical book that its publisher is requesting you "return to your local bookseller" if you happen not personally to have purchased it! (contra US law) Thinking that the physicality of the book is what's critical, and not a history of social struggle, is called "fetishism"
Pretty sure that questions of privacy and surveillance are social and legal questions, not an artifact of the final product's form? Were these books written by hand, Daniel? Using magic ink? Did you teleport to the library? When you move house, do you have magic spirits to help you?
southern racist John Crowe Ransom (April 30, 1888 – July 3, 1974) moves to Ohio to start literary school premised on ignoring history, gets nominated for the Pulitzer prize
this is actually really encouraging — the "centrism" complicit in the rise of American authoritarianism has no socio-material basis, and is entirely limited to a few hundred people online intoning daily self-congratulations for how they voted in the past
you ever watch Tiandao (2007)? worst music for a show I've ever seen, but the plot is interesting enough
[explanation, tedious] Famously, Jia 賈 is homophonous with 假 “fake, false," whereas Eyre is homophonous with "error." In the texts of both Hongloumeng and Jane Eyre these connections are explicitly made. Baoyu means "precious jade" and Baoyu was made in error, an unneeded extra piece of the sky
Any of you watching The Lead 主角 (2026)? It's a good show, to be sure. Great visuals of traditional Chinese performance. Hard not to tire, though, of how female characters are being portrayed. Brave and dedicated, yet quiet and composed? "Strong female" with male fantasy characteristics imo...
Notice, by the way, the seeming reference, shall we say... indebtedness to David Graeber's cover design
one of the greatest things about Goodreads is when ordinary people review academic titles, and they simply are not interested in flattering the author 😂
author on one page lists readily recognizable romantic gestures, calling them all "empty signification" on the next page bemoans the very idea of love's having any cross-cultural identity; bemoans how "love is fetishized as a global currency" fetishizing... love?
only a few chapters in, but this is clearly a defining text of our era, a book that everyone sooner or later will have read press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/bo...