TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻

@maytree1

🏳️‍🌈to piss off homophobes; 🇺🇦to piss off #Putinverstehers. Uncommented retweets *are* endorsements; views my employer's (self-employed). Pronouns: I/me. Twitter aka 𝕏:

668 Following334 Followers307 Posts

Reddit Bluesky

Is this your profile?Claim it and maytree1.dirty.social is yours.Claim profile

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· 1d

She did ask for feedback on how to improve and didn't get it. Unless you think that being asked to check your "white privilege" and humbly accept your grade constitutes adequate feedback. www.reddit.com/r/UniUK/comm...

"I asked for a meeting with him to ask him to explain why he had given me the mark and provide feedback. At Roehampton marking is blind so he didn't know whose essay it was when he marked it but in the meeting he implied that I was racist and that the only reason I wasn’t happy with 70% was due to my white privilege."

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· 1d

The point is that Arday rarely used the slides prepared by his predecessor, which were still available online and which the student seemed to find more substantial. See screenshot from the Reddit post the article is based on, which makes this a bit clearer. www.reddit.com/r/UniUK/comm...

"Yes, I was on the one module that he was brought in to teach at Roehampton in the Autumn term of 2018. It wasn't his module, it was written by a previous academic and he made no changes to the moodle or updates. He was a terrible teacher who frequently arrived late and left early, on one occasion only teaching for 1 hour out of a 4 hour lecture. He rarely used the Powerpoint slides, made by the previous lecturer, in his lectures and usually sat on a desk giving his generalised opinion on racism, often drawing on his own experiences without reference to theories or academics relevant to the module (Youth Participation and Identities). "

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· May 12

Signal hat sich nur allgemein geäußert und nicht von sich aus behauptet, dass Klöckner u.a. ihre PIN herausgegeben haben. Dass sie das getan haben müssen, folgt aber aus den bekannten und nicht dementierten Informationen. www.tagesschau.de/inland/kloec... www.spiegel.de/politik/deut...

"Bundestagspräsidentin Julia Klöckner ist Opfer der aktuellen Phishing-Angriffswelle gegen Nutzer des Messengerdienstes Signal geworden. Das Signal-Konto der CDU-Politikerin wurde von den Angreifern erfolgreich kompromittiert, wie mehrere Quellen dem SPIEGEL bestätigen."

"Signal nehme die Berichte zur Übernahme von Konten von Regierungsvertretern und Journalisten "sehr ernst", erklärte der Messenger-Anbieter auf der Plattform X. Die Verschlüsselung und Infrastruktur von Signal sei aber nicht kompromittiert worden. Denn die Angriffe zielten darauf, Nutzer dazu zu verleiten, selbst Informationen preiszugeben. Der Messenger-Dienst betonte, der Signal-Support nehme "niemals über In-App-Nachrichten, SMS oder soziale Medien Kontakt" mit Nutzern auf, um ihren Bestätigungscode oder ihre PIN zu erfragen". Gegen Phishing-Versuche helfe letztlich nur "die Wachsamkeit der Nutzer"."

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Apr 22

Come on. She's not blaming capitalism, she's blaming Labour's VAT on school fees.

"The agent mentioned that Labour’s VAT on school fees has affected people’s ability to move up the property ladder. When they’ve got to find tens of thousands more to put their children through school, it means shelving plans to move."

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Apr 1

Unpopuläre Meinung: Die zunehmende Verbreitung von Deep Fakes wird für Opfer (und für alle, die von denen *authentische*, aber ihnen im Nachhinein unangenehme Bild- oder Tondokumente existieren) Vorteil, weil sie ihnen „plausible deniability“ ermöglicht.

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Feb 26

The name Maxwell already deserves to be a "byword for scandal" simply because Robert Maxwell single-handedly established the mafia-like, parasitic business model of today's academic journals. His (and his daughter's) later exploits shouldn't even have been necessary for this. 1/2

"The way to make money from a scientific article looks very similar, except that scientific publishers manage to duck most of the actual costs. Scientists create work under their own direction – funded largely by governments – and give it to publishers for free; the publisher pays scientific editors who judge whether the work is worth publishing and check its grammar, but the bulk of the editorial burden – checking the scientific validity and evaluating the experiments, a process known as peer review – is done by working scientists on a volunteer basis. The publishers then sell the product back to government-funded institutional and university libraries, to be read by scientists – who, in a collective sense, created the product in the first place.

It is as if the New Yorker or the Economist demanded that journalists write and edit each other’s work for free, and asked the government to foot the bill. Outside observers tend to fall into a sort of stunned disbelief when describing this setup. A 2004 parliamentary science and technology committee report on the industry drily observed that “in a traditional market suppliers are paid for the goods they provide”. A 2005 Deutsche Bank report referred to it as a “bizarre” “triple-pay” system, in which “the state funds most research, pays the salaries of most of those checking the quality of research, and then buys most of the published product”."

"Even scientists who are fighting for reform are often not aware of the roots of the system: how, in the boom years after the second world war, entrepreneurs built fortunes by taking publishing out of the hands of scientists and expanding the business on a previously unimaginable scale. And no one was more transformative and ingenious than Robert Maxwell, who turned scientific journals into a spectacular money-making machine that bankrolled his rise in British society. Maxwell would go on to become an MP, a press baron who challenged Rupert Murdoch, and one of the most notorious figures in British life. But his true importance was far larger than most of us realise. Improbable as it might sound, few people in the last century have done more to shape the way science is conducted today than Maxwell."

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Feb 2

I'm sceptical about attempts at quantifying "democratic backsliding", but even so the state of democracy in the US is now being plausibly compared to Russia, Hungary, Venezuela, and Turkey - even if we assume that it has a more resilient democratic tradition than those countries.

Diagram from the Financial Times showing a "democratic backsliding" for Trump's second term that is progressing faster than in the other countries mentioned in the post.

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Oct 31

Ich bin froh, dass ich höchstens mal Tetris spiele – oder „Thru the Wall“ auf einem ZX-Spectrum-Emulator. Da fiel mir der Abschied von Windows wesentlich leichter. 2/2

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Sep 4

Sample:

An Accessibility Relation Based On The Point Of Conception

To “whittle down” the set of possible worlds to deliver one that meets Heying’s intuition, we would need to define an accessibility relation that connects only possible worlds in which an individual can (possibly) produce only one gamete type.

A seemingly reasonable way to approach this would be to define accessibility as being limited to the set of worlds in which an individual has the same genome, taking the existence of an individual to begin at the point of conception, and so considering only possible life histories post-conception.⁶

But this can’t work for Heying’s purposes either.

Some individuals who don’t produce gametes simply won’t produce them in any such accessible possible world: no matter how many times you rewind a life history to an earlier point in life and “replay the tape”, you can only average out chance developmental fluctuations.

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Sep 4

This is neither a biologist nor a woman.

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Nov 18

I think it's amazing how misled people keep quoting that article after the author herself has clarified that it was, to say the least, misleading. It's even more amazing that the article wasn't retracted or at least fundamentally revised to avoid further any confusion.

Screenshot of clarification by author Claire Ainsworth that she doesn't claim there are more than two sexes.

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Dec 1

Was mich wundert: Alle Welt empört sich über Musk und die Posts, die er auf X zulässt, und fordert auf, deswegen X zu verlassen oder zu boykottieren. Klar, kann man machen. Aber wer regt sich eigentlich über die dubiose Werbung auf, die Alphabet (Google) auf YouTube zulässt?

Screenshot von Werbung auf YouTube. Text:
„Musk: „Soros hasst Menschheit“
Musk wird mittels X (ehemals Twitter) Soros NGOs verklagen
Gesponsert
Epoch Times Deutsch“

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Nov 14

Danke für den Hinweis, das war vor meiner aktiven Zeit auf Twitter. Der Tonfall wirkt (zurückhaltend gesagt) unangenehm empathielos, aber dass Behinderte „nicht die gleichen Rechte“ wie Nicht-Behinderte haben sollten, entnehme ich dem nicht. 1/

"Miriam Vollmer
@miriam_vollmer
Sie hätten als Erstklässler ihren schlagenden, spuckenden und
stinkenden Zwangsnachbarn, der nicht lesen konnte, natürlich
geliebt.
1:58 nachm. 30. Mai 2017
1
Deine Antwort posten
Antworten
Miriam Vollmer @miriam_vollmer • 30. Mai 2017
Ich bin bis heute davon überzeugt, dass es falsch ist, Kinder als
Hilfslehrer für verhsltensgestörte Mitschüler einzusetzen."

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Nov 13

Sehr interessant! de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_t... de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_(...

TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻@maytree1· Nov 1

Vielmehr geht es darum, was mit Menschen geschehen soll, die wg. der obigen Schutzgründe bzw. Abschiebeverbote keinen Rechtsanspruch auf Aufenthalt haben. Das sind zwar viel mehr, als Rechtskonservative es gerne hätten (2022 über 72% der inhaltlichen entschiedenen Fälle), aber eben nicht 100%. 3/