Pseudo Bambi
@pseudo-bambi
Pretending to be Bambi in all sorts of places since 2002.
They’re grouped together because funded by the same people. Always follow the money.
Hi Kate. What are your thoughts on the Conversion Practices bill. 1.3 and 1.9 seem to be an instruction manual for legitimising rather than banning.
@brianklaas.bsky.social has some very good insights into that question.
The rollback of trans people rights are not scientifically sound. Here are 3 examples for you to ignore. Puberty blockers are harmful to trans children but still proscribed to cis children because they have a good safety record and are entirely reversible. EXAMPLE: Precocious puberty.
Ok. I’ll try one last time. In science ‘trans’ means ‘on the other side’. A trans man is a man on the other side [the female side]. Not a woman. Can we at least agree on using scientific terminology?
This doesn’t say GRA caused a problem. And GRA certainly didn’t cause cis men to be rapists. Neither did it cause a vulnerable man to be left alone with violent rapists.
Trans men are 20 times at risk compared to cis men and continue to get screening. Trans women at 47 times the risk can be excluded. Code 13.152
If you’ve tried to make it workable and it doesn’t work, may be its basis is unsound? Can we get back to science please? (It also has cross party support, Lab, Lib Dem, Green, Indy, Scott’s Nat, Your Party, Plaid)
Looks like cracking down on bullshit would be a popular thing for gov to do.
Asked which party represents working people, somewhere between 1/5 and 1/3 of all parties think not even their party does.
Too many aren’t making it. Child suicide rate started to improve, until the kids got social media.
Thanks for keeping up with this. It really needs to be a much large part of our national conversation. If anyone wants more context and insight, ‘Plotters’ is an excellent read.
Y axis seems to start at 90,000. That’s not how we count, nor is it how we were taught to create graphs at school.