Simon Lester
@simonlester
Founded WorldTradeLaw.net & ChinaTradeMonitor.com Non-Resident Fellow @bakerinstitute.bsky.social Trade Policy feed:
They seem to be panicking about the possibility of lost US weapons export sales.
Is the "upsurge in desire for engagement with the United States" in the room with you now?
It doesn't seem possible to cut needed spending AND increase the US federal budget deficit, and yet here we are.
From @scottlincicome.bsky.social on the recent talk about communism:
Apparently only clairvoyant people could have predicted the Platner revelations of today, so congrats to everyone on here for being clairvoyant!
More here: "the relevant principles ... must be faithfully applied not only to circumstances as they existed in 1787, 1791, and 1868, for example, but also to modern situations that were unknown or unanticipated by the Constitution’s Framers." Like maybe the gun situation?
From Justice Kavanaugh: "significant illegal immigration into the United States is a new circumstance that was largely unknown as of 1868 and that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment could not have fully anticipated." OK, but could the framers of the 2nd amendment have anticipated modern guns?
There's an effort underway to present Vance as an anti-hawk, but I think the internal GOP battle is really more about standard hawks like Vance versus über-hawks like Lindsey Graham. wapo.st/4eNWKo0
Thank you random reddit user for articulating what I've been thinking
Which economies get 10% and which get 12.5% under USTR's proposed Section 301 tariffs related to forced labor imports? The Federal Register notice breaks it down: ustr.gov/sites/defaul...
I know there's a lot to be outraged about, but a refugee policy that is almost exclusively for white people should be an above the fold headline in every major paper every day. www.economist.com/united-state...
The actual Pew survey data on which this article is based is not exactly reassuring, but is perhaps as not as bad as the headline makes it sound.
It's the official start of my "fantasizing about moving to Canada" season
Just arrived in the mail. Can't wait to read it, and then start and win a trade war!
It hadn't been totally clear to me if @wsocial.eu was being built on the AT Protocol, but this seems definitive.
(To get a bit more technical, USTR is running things, but there's an interagency process)
I'm skeptical of many of @linamkhan.bsky.social's antitrust views, but I would like to see her posting on Bluesky. Would be a good way to take on corporate power.
I missed the "neoliberalism" debate last night, but highlighted below is a question I once asked. The problem I see is that no one is defining the term in a way that makes it easy to figure out who falls into the category.
Spanberger has been too extreme according to ... Jill Biden's former spokesman? Congrats on successfully digging so deep to find a Dem to criticize her!
There's an effort in the media to present Tucker Carlson (and various others) as "anti-war," but when you read the full details it always turns out they just want to focus US foreign policy on China, so even if they object to wars A or B, I'm not sure "anti-war" is the right term here.
I'm interpreting this @economist.com headline to mean they think economists themselves should engage in sex work and I'm not going to read the article to find out anything different.
Thinking back on when Matt Stoller believed the Trump administration would be a tough antitrust enforcer. 🙃