Streetlight
@streetlight
Still cites the old magic (critical theory/history) | Eora Land | From the River to the Sea StreetliTweets at the Other Place
I keep returning, again and again, to this passage of Marriott's On Black Men, since yesterday:
If you tweak this just a little, then Homer's answer to the paradox of motion is simply that motion is possible because the Gods abandon you.
Dedication page of George Ciccariello-Maher's Decolonizing Dialectics.
"Hence our shame, the shame of those who did not know the camps and yet, without knowing how, are spectators of that match, which repeats itself in every match in our stadiums, in every television broadcast, in the normalcy of everyday life".
Been wrestling with the celebration of football in the midst of genocide, and then remembered it isn't the first time. Remnants of Auschwitz:
I think what this text does better than any other I know is show how effortlessly language deforms the ordinary succession of time. What is a 'now' of language? You can't locate it, not really. Not when idioms themselves are agglutinations of linguistic history & projections of –
Going Greek! Nicole Loraux's The Divided City: On Memory and Forgetting in Ancient Athens.
Augustine's definition of intelligence - the faculty by which man can *enslave* another regardless of strength, and thus distinguishes man from animal - probably remains the most honest of its definitions, worth keeping in mind for debates around "A"I.
Serres on the Harlequinian cogito // Deleuze on the sexual body as Harlequin's cloak everything patched and folded together
That time Wittgenstein designed a house and it just kinda looks like the Tractatus.
Jean Wahl, laying out the project of transcendental empiricism in 1944: "the higher empiricism ... that seeks to show the conditions, let us not say the possibility, but of the reality of experience".
"Against Kant, he pursues the plan of concrete ontology; against Hegel, he pursues the plan of an ontology that does not succumb to the existent by absorbing into itself. / Hegel is turned inside out: world history is for Hegel what the individual is for Kierkegaard."
Adorno's condensed but punchy recap of the passage from Kant > Hegel > Kierkegaard, measuring the distance and nearness of each to the next: