Toronto Will
@torontowill
Cat lover, Trekkie (FoD), NE Patriots fan, video game enthusiast. Professionally: lawyer.
Toronto reportedly had the world’s worst air quality yesterday, at an AQI of ~160. Today? 🤐 I haven’t seen Americans complaining about “Canadian wildfires” yet, but I know I will, and it will infuriate me. These are global warming’s wildfires, and the yanks have every bit as much ownership of them.
Ahh. The article originally said 50bn. Relieved I’m not the only one who realized that couldn’t be right.
The article says 20bn, which is still bananas, but not as bananas as 50bn.
I like to look at the "strong approve" number, as a leading indicator of whether the floor might drop out, on his stubbornly persistent ~40% approval. It's 19% in this poll, and even among self-identified "MAGA supporters" it's 63%. The floor ain't firm.
A pretty good and biting analysis of the SpaceX IPO, with only two points that irked me. One being credulousness towards Anthropic (an AI competitor's) claim to being profitable, and the other "presuming" that cooling is easy in space. No! You link to a Tom's Hardware that quantifies the difficulty.
I'm getting 2FA emails from Facebook that I did not trigger. I want to use Facebook's security tools to verify these emails are actually from them (rather than phishing), and see if there's evidence of someone else trying to login. Their page that shows what emails they've sent me is... broken.
I sometimes get despondent at how awful the social internet is, knowing it *can* be such an amazing way to connect people and share experiences. In this case I'm not just talking about the scrolly apps, I'm talking about product reviews. Get a load of this, from the totally human "Amazon Customer":
The military-industrial complex is hard at work misunderstanding sci-fi, yet again.
I got really mad at a CBC article for writing a long article about intellectual property without even comprehending the basic difference between copyright and trademark, and then just as I was posting my tirade…
“I don’t know what to do with my arms, does this look natural on camera?” “Nailed it in one boss, don’t change anything” “Really, just hang my hands limply like this?” “PERFECT”
You point out the "insatiable demand" isn't real in the sense that it's really just 2 companies who happen to be heavily subsidized by the companies they're buying the compute from, but I'm also suspicious that supply is not actually "overwhelmed". Somehow it's always available if you pay more!
Incredible. A new camera angle that makes Snap’s dork spectacles look even dorkier. bsky.app/profile/ktla...
I'm weary of overreacting to single polls, been fooled by it before. Trump remains over 41% in the RCP average, and he actually had comparably awful numbers about 18 months into his first term. Breaking through that floor of support is like jackhammering cement.
Wait wtf is this. I’m just learning that Snap is doing AR (??) and in 2026 this is what they have to show for it, the man went on stage looking like this.
Winner! And my verdict is that the headline poorly describes the article. There is some anxiety among OpenAI investors that they’re making questionable tactical decisions, but there’s no specifics of anyone being worried that the company is valued too highly. I still think that makes no sense.
Meanwhile just today a huge, obtrusive Copilot button toggled itself *on* in my Outlook mobile app. (But it might have been pushed on by my employer, it didn’t toggle on for my personal account).
If you let yourself think you've become smart enough to *intuit* answers without doing the necessary work to actually find out, the mistakes will start to pile up. Even worse when someone's ego gets so inflated they trust their intuition over evidence.
It’s probably just legal ass covering, to save face from copyright infringement (when the bot copies without attribution). Also they want to own copyright over contributions, and you cannot assign them copyright if you don’t have it in the first place.
@edzitron.com 👀 whoa. I don't love Linus for a variety of reasons, but he's kind of a big deal, and this feels maybe significant as a mainstream breakthrough (towards the things you've been screaming for years).
I'm simplifying this to a pithy tweet, obviously the full story is more complicated, it's a book (Karen Hao's). But officially: no, it played no part in the decision to fire him.
They do have to personally sign a declaration. For civil liability they'd be insured, but the fear would be criminal penalty. Below e.g. in a filing from Microsoft. The statute: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
"Mistrust" was the headline reason, but mistrust *about what*. The things he was being slippery with the Board about were generally angled towards moving faster and being more aggressive, in ways that cast aside safety concerns. From Karen Hao's "Empire of AI" (just a quickly-spotted example):