Rochelle
@uberwensch
like if Just Some Guy was a girl pfp: @nokomento.bsky.social
I'm sure you're all dying to see another photo of me from the same angle in the same mirror making the same face. I cannot help but oblige. Enjoy your meslop.
It is July 26. I am posting the #MathCoffeeSelfie thread. It is May 17. I am posting the #MathCoffeeSelfie thread. It is September 27. I am posting the #MathCoffeeSelfie thread.
I've been binge-watching the videos on the Oxford Philosophy of Physics channel
There's a kink in the idea that the time-separated paths like γ_t(s) = (s,0,0,t) should be going off to different asymptotes, which is that it might be a coordinate-dependent intuition? Due to the fact I can swap time-ordering of some of the points along two such γ.
you're right. there's some ambiguity over what it means to "know the accelerations" Here's what I had in mind. Two congruent journeys, one larger than the other. I imagined knowing only that kink 1 of angle 1 would occur; later on, kink 2; later on, kink 3 and not how much time between
No, its just that the diagram misleads. Here's a right triangle, drawn over a picture of me for no reason. It is a fact that its sides satisfy the Pythagorean theorem, like all other right triangles. I cannot change this by labeling one side with a time interval.
I'm heading back to sleep for a little bit. Here's a picture from yesterday. As far as math, I am thinking about relativistic causality conditions for quantum systems.
Yeah thats the sorta feat that's possible. That lies squarely in the realm of possibility.
Did anyone else read Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers? Remember that guy Christopher Langan he glazed so hard for having an IQ "off the charts"? Deeply funny(?) that Langan would later say this regarding his pet theory, the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe.
Although possibly I was too quick to agree (c.f. Costello's comment at the bottom of this excerpt, page 48 of his text)
i think a first order of business as a 30-year-old is to finally figure out how to have hair
this no longer contains @matthematics.com's reply: "I tried fitting into last years' short exact sequence, and it split"