I feel very sympathetic to this viewpoint and would have echoed it up to maybe even a few years ago. (Still do on white supremacy.) But I'm not sure how messaging against "American Exceptionalism" could ever avoid coming across to most as "Actually, America ain't shit"
Just plunking this here for future reference (Getting There by Stephen Goddard, pp. 191 and 194)
Fascists by Civic Center BART (approx 4 people / 2 "Appeal to Heaven" flags)
For that goddamned burrito image. I saw it once, that's enough for a lifetime
1. If all the little nagging inconveniences really make you assess your life as overall miserable, you have an outlook problem and are probably a pain to those around you
There's COVID notices and barriers and distance indicators sticking around here & there, and then there's...
Capitol not White House, but something like this seems the eventual outcome if we try to perpetually freeze all these buildings in amber, ballroom or not
On the one hand, at least it doesn't privilege longstanding owners over new. On the other...
Really sad that Cleves decided to frame such a thoroughly cited work as a violation
Then it comes into more general use in or by the 1890s (alongside "property developer"), the next citation being a pamphlet from George Beken, 1890. I can't find this pamphlet, but from his other writings he appears to have been focused on countering Georgism!
The OED's first citation of the word in this sense is in William Nassau Lees's "Tea cultivation, cotton, and other agricultural experiments in India" (1863), where "developer" seems to mean someone establishing a farm. So, pretty colonialist, if clear-eyed about some things
I think the real answer is success out of Stanford Law breeds this attitude
If your political strategy requires the Mayor of New York to not talk about policing besides a few ceremonial commonplaces, you do not have a political strategy.