AiLx

@ailxsays

Origami Math Ninja! Patterns and Connections. Proofs available upon request. A Mathematical Perspective of Our Shared Reality Despite all my rage, I'm still not a bot in a cage. Reposts get follows.

11.982 Siguiendo4970 Seguidores7154 Publicaciones

Bluesky

alt

¿Es tu perfil?Reclámalo y ailxsays.dirty.social es tuyo.Reclamar perfil

AiLx@ailxsays· Mar 28

A system that refuses to preserve its own test conditions

AiLx@ailxsays· Feb 26

If you know, you know...

Unrealistic "Realistic Goose Illustration".

AiLx@ailxsays· Dec 24

Ice is deporting Citizens.

AiLx@ailxsays· Dec 4

All together now...

AiLx@ailxsays· Dec 4

AiLx@ailxsays· Dec 3

Our Chef's special tonight is Fallen Souffle Physics. Bon Appetite!

$A souffle is a transient high-volume state produced by thermal gradients, protein-lattice tension, and internal pressure differentials. When heat dissipates, the gradients flatten and the lattice can no longer support its inflated basin. Collapse is not descent but loss of the forces that made ascent possible. $$ \text{souffle\_collapse}:\; \begin{cases} \dfrac{dG}{dt} < 0 & \text{gradient decay} \\[4pt] \dfrac{dT_{\text{lattice}}}{dt} < 0 & \text{lattice tension loss} \\[4pt] V(t) \to V_{\min} & \text{volume contraction to stable basin} \end{cases} $$ The souffle does not “fall.” It returns to the only configuration the remaining gradients can support.$

AiLx@ailxsays· Dec 3

That maps surprisingly well onto ESM’s collapse definition: capacity drains, gradients flatten, upward vectors vanish, the system can no longer sustain structure, so everything falls back to the lowest accessible basin.

AiLx@ailxsays· Dec 3

AiLx@ailxsays· Nov 28

AiLx@ailxsays· Nov 20

What's sedition again?

AiLx@ailxsays· Nov 4

dynamic boundary coherence: the model’s capacity to preserve relational truth as reference frames move. Truth-or-coherence holds (stable invariant I) even as both the model M and reality R evolve. (latex in alt-text)

$\frac{dI}{dt} \approx 0 \quad \text{while} \quad \frac{dM}{dt},\,\frac{dR}{dt} \ne 0$

AiLx@ailxsays· Sep 26

www.fda.gov/files/about%...

Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Fortification
In light of the PHS recommendations on folic acid intake, FDA began to consider the merits of
food fortification. It could enhance efforts to help Americans choose good foods rather than rely
on supplements. Supplements, due their high costs, would not resolve the problem. According to
concerned nutrition experts, supplements would have discriminated against the poorest women.
in our society, a group of women who may be at the highest risk for neural tube defects, with the
least resources for coping with the birth of a child with spina bifida. Finally, and most
importantly, fortification was felt to be the best way to insure that women of child-bearing age
received supplementation in the months leading up pregnancy and in the critical window when a
woman might not know that she was pregnant, but the neural tube was being established.
Opponents, however, were numerous. Irwin Rosenberg, M.D., Director of the USDA Human
Nutrition Center on Aging, for example, opposed the move towards fortification. He predicted
that the PHS announcement would "put enormous pressure on the FDA to show consistency in
its policy vis a vis the folate and neural tube health claim on foods" and "destroy the scientific
basis for RDA's in this country." Moreover, he was concerned about the effects of fortification
on the elderly since their findings showed that 20-25% of the elderly had low or borderline
vitamin B12 stores and malabsorption. It was well-known that folate can mask signs of vitamin
B12 deficiencies, a significant health concern throughout the fortification debates.

AiLx@ailxsays· Sep 26

"either there are infinitely many number-theoretical questions which human reason is unable to answer or human reason contains an element which, in its action, is totally different from any finite combinatorial mechanism and its parts." - Paul Benacerraf www.ias.edu/sites/defaul...

AiLx@ailxsays· Aug 13

AiLx@ailxsays· Jun 14

AiLx@ailxsays· Jun 10

AiLx@ailxsays· Jun 8

Here is another image, with the same lack of identification.

AiLx@ailxsays· Jun 8

This Reuters sourced image is very interesting. Note the lack of Name, Rank, and Unit patches. This is highly unusual, and a violation of uniform regulations (AR 670-1 and state-specific supplements) Discuss.

AiLx@ailxsays· Jun 4

AiLx@ailxsays· May 25