Alasdair Mackenzie
@alasdairmackenzie
Immigration and asylum law. All views my own but reposts not endorsement. Refugees welcome🧡. Green Party member💚. Trans 🏳️⚧️ rights are human rights. He/him. "Lawyers have hitherto only interpreted the law. The point however is to change it."
A guide takes a writer and an academic to a room in an empty building. When they get there nothing happens. They leave
Silly me, I missed the bit when the Labour government prioritised the views of metropolitan Britain (whatever those are deemed to be)
You’re correct! Conditions restricting access to public funds can only be imposed on limited leave, and adding them to ILR would require primary legislation - see s.3 Immigration Act 1971
When you’ve a to-do list as long as your tail and it’s only Tuesday
Yes, I’m not convinced it was the *voters* who were primarily at fault in this respect
No: Labour and its cheerleaders regarding vileness to migrants, for purposes of impressing racists who will never vote for it, as a success is a primary reason why the government is a failure [source in alt]
Staggering comments on immigration and national security by the “independent reviewer of terrorism legislation” following mass acts of literal terrorism carried out by non-migrant UK citizens
Starmer’s X account found time to call the original knife attack “sickening” and to say he had “no tolerance” for it (in case you thought he did), but he’s made no comment there about mobs of racists driving people from their homes, bar RTing a watery “legitimate concerns but” post by Hilary Benn
Your reminder that this is supposed to be the good guy of British centrism, the one who’s our last chance of defeating the far right
Sky’s Beth Rigby last night: “It’s a tough job but we just try to inform our viewers without sensationalism” Sky News this evening: “WHAT IF NEO-NAZIS ARE RIGHT, HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT THAT?”
If I’m understanding the Home Office’s trial age assessment tech, it gets people’s ages wrong by an *average* of 2.5-3 years, is inaccurate for the most crucial cohort (teenagers) and is worse in assessing women/girls and non-white people (umm…) but they’re going for it anyway, because computer
Of all the bankrupt arguments you could give for platforming “Tommy Robinson”, probably the worst is that facilitating fascists is enabling “conversations that would not otherwise take place”, rather than being forced down our throats on a constant basis
Don’t feel we should normalise a Labour minister responding to a spat between ethnic cleansers as to exactly how violent and racist they are going to be by saying “well this seems a bit disorganised“
Pretty shocked by these figures as I’d assumed it was still the case that Labour members are more liberal than the leadership. But here we are, and this is the party, still described by some as a party of the left, which the Greens are supposed to be making common cause with
Wow it’s almost like fighting a must-win election on Reform turf wasn’t an outstanding idea
If, as reported, there was some sort of dispute between Starmer and Mahmood over immigration policy, it‘s pretty clear over on the bad site who won
So they’ve amended it but for heavens sake what made someone think the original was acceptable
Genuinely gobsmacked at this headline about someone accused of attempting to murder three (3) people, the third of whom has a Muslim-sounding name
The BBC has decided that Zack’s repost is more important for you to know about than, among other things, the actual suspect being brought to court, a leading businessman being convicted of rape or the commencement of the Renters Rights Act
What if the true antiracists were the racists? Incredible scenes
Also, it’s always worth remembering that Stephen Pollard spent years writing vicious anti-migrant screeds for the Express and Mail
Stop scrolling & post two characters who bring you happiness
Fundamentally we seem to have managed to have a massive racist meltdown over voter fraud because some volunteers observed “some instances of more than one voter going into a booth at the same time, and instances of people looking over the shoulder of voters”