Alex Drace-Francis
@alexdrace
Cultural historian of modern Europe. Associate Professor @uvahumanities.bsky.social Books: "The Making of Mămăligă", "Networks, Narratives and Nations", “Un boem la Bucureşti” &c.
Capsella EN: shepherd's purse DE: Hirtentäschel 'shepherd's purse' FR: Bourse à pasteur 'shepherd's purse' IT: Borsa di pastore 'shepherd's purse' HU: pásztortáska 'shepherd's purse' RO: Coaiele popii 'priest's bollocks'
In my plant studies I came across fosókásszilva for the mirabelle plum
Utagawa Kunimori II, Corn transforms to a cock at Shinagawa. Woodblock print, c.1844.
Utagawa Kuniyoshi (1797-1861), Comic Corn Swinging the Hair, Private Collection. Exhibited in 2021 at Ōta Memorial Museum of Art, Shibuya, Japan. www.ukiyoe-ota-muse.jp/kuniyoshi21-...
Victor Mihăilescu-Craiu, Woman making mămăligă (1969) Iasi Art Museum culturalia.ro/search/33013...
Nice to read such a deservedly positive review of this excellent book on "Towns Between Empires" The book is Open Access here: www.aup.nl/en/book/9789...
Finally ("Ecoul", Oradea, 1928) Still doesn't say what made of digital.bibliotecaarad.ro/files/origin...
Has anyone heard of Sphinx, a brand of oil? Used to dress an "Albanian salad" served on the Lafayette terrace, Bucharest 1938. www.dcnews.ro/reteta-de-sa...
"If you feed a greedy person, he will claim that, instead of beef, you should have served him wild boar sausages and roe deer kebabs." (Odobescu, 1874)
Fun kebab fact for World Kebab Day: In 19th-century Wallachia, kebabs - chiabapuri, fripturi turceşti - were perceived as an elite food, served at the Prince's table. (Filimon, Ciocoii vechi si noi)
⤴️Doublet of Slavic чорногуз. The term is commonly applied to the stork (Ciconia ciconia), so as an anthroponym may not have pejorative associations en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D1%87%...
Also Curnegru 'black-ass' (1570) Documenta Romaniae Historica, Series B, vol. 6, doc. 207, p. 256.
Best early modern Romanian name: Glegorcea Laptiacru (1620). Wd be something like "Gregson Curdmilk" Documente privitoare la oraşul Iaşi, vol. I, p. 187-188 (Slavonic original with modern Romanian translation)
Oldest I have found is 1830 ꙞИ (also Curierul rumanesc - in 1829 Ꙟ still used for <În>
Already in 1836 we have ꙞN News item about Ottoman forces quelling a revolt of Albanian bandits (Curierul rumânesc, An. 7, nr. 5, 17 February 1836, Bucharest)
Then in the 'transition alphabet' (mixture of Cyrillic and Latin) it becomes much closer to <î>. Example from Bucharest, 1845.
Now I can't seem to find a digitized copy of the above. But here is the 2nd edition (1840), where the title is changed from "Grammaire vallaque" to "Grammaire roumâne" dspace.bcu-iasi.ro/handle/12345...
In the 1860s Bukovinian scholars Aron Pumnul and I.G. Sbiera argued that that î should be used throughout, for consistency
A different pressure was etymological, coming from the Transylvanian School. They argued e.g. that the words today spelt bând (“drinking”) and dând (“giving”), should be spelt differently to reflect their origins (Latin bibens > bind, but dans > dand)
But in some iterations of the ‘transition alphabet’ (which mixed Cyrillic and Latin letters in the 19thc), Ꙟ came to stand just for the vowel and a Latin n was added. It is possible that Ꙟ's visual similarity to <î> influenced later spelling conventions in the Latin alphabet.
Older influences on <â> and î in Romanian: in Cyrillic, the vowel /ɨ/, was represented by the letter Ꙟ in initial position but ѫ in medial, e.g. Ꙟтѫмпинаре întâmpinare. NB: Ꙟ originally represented not just the initial vowel but initial <în-> or <îm->.
I would put it rather differently: The symbols <â> and <î> do not represent distinct vowels, but different orthographic representations of the same vowel. Also often misunderstood - <î> was not introduced in 1953. Many publications from the 19th century used it.
A rare document attesting to the emancipation of slaves in Wallachia #OnThisDay in 1848. Bears the stamp of the Commission for the Liberation of Slaves (via National History Museum of Romania)
But Swift did satirize the stupidity of using machines to create language in 1726, so maybe it was inevitable
Great conference on the Phanariots, the Greek-speaking elite who came from Istanbul to govern Moldavia and Wallachia in the eighteenth century. Historians of Britain shd attend too, because as Nicolae Iorga pointed out, Britain too was ruled by Phanariots, from Hanover.