Great article, have to shout-out this factoid that I didn't know and is the funniest thing I've read this week
Allez, celle du CNRTL est pas mal non plus! www.cnrtl.fr/etymologie/c... Du bas latin pour "sorte de citrouille", du latin pour "citron" en raison de la couleur jaune citron de la citrouille mais oui bien sûr !
Wait, you don't know? That's confusing, he clearly has an immense respect for your field
LMFAO are you trying to tell me you think it's not true? It honestly didn't occur to me given how easily searchable it is but if you didn't want to look it up yourself you just had to ask me for the source dude pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
There is literally nobody you could have been quoting on this but yourself
Wait... whaaaaaaaaaaaaat How is it possible, clearly they do know about shirts, I don't understand why don't they wear them doesn't everyone wear shirts when given the choice isn't that a human universal from back when Homo erectus wore unscraped hides the lice failed to notice
Here are some Dassanesh men from Ethiopia, a region mentioned in the paper as one people have particularly dark skin (not the Sahara), racistly not wearing shirts, presumably because they are too primitive to conceive of the idea www.beyondphototoursafrica.com/blog/dassane...
... than what Bari Weiss wrote about Refaat Alareer and look where that went. As an aside, when I was looking up what she'd written about him again I ran across this and OMG how bleak can things be
Although I've got to say it doesn't change my overall opinion of the paper so I do get a kick out of all the pro-Israeli faction calling for people to cancel their subscription
Interesting article, I had a question coming back again and again as I read it and then I found the article asked it too near the end: Like, what *is* your job? Fighting disinformation, or fighting persuasive communication from the enemy, and if it's the latter how's the enemy defined?
"Albeit now refined" in the paper I cited that's much more recent (2026 preprint) and discusses life starting from carbon metabolism, following a sequence that's more or less what alkaline hydrothermal vent hypotheses propose?
The system described there has an energy source but has no entropy sink, no structured flux. No mechanisms to concentrate organic molecules so they'll actually react with each other, or remove products of a reaction so the disequilibrium that drives it is maintained. AHVs's physical structure do.
That's another good example for abiogenesis being a fractured field as pointed out in the Lane & Xavier paper you posted awhile back; this section talks about "these popular theories" as if it were all abiogenesis theories when it's mostly those in synthetic chemistry; AHV hypotheses don't do this
This is a good complement to Kristof's article in NYT: "Rape and Torture in Palestine What Nicholas Kristof left out of The New York Times." matthewhoh.substack.com/p/rape-and-t...
FWIW, having read more of the article I think I found the answer to my question: the first sentence referred to this quote by Sari Bashi. Personally I think it's an empty technicality to focus on explicit orders when something's been normalised, but I'd guess that's where that sentence came from.
A powerful piece that's still (sadly) relevant now, thank you for linking it This part makes me think of the people at the time of the DNC who couldn't imagine why having a Palestinian speak at the DNC would possibly matter to anyone.
That strikes me as another abiogenesis idea that's more about "what could happen" than "is there any reason to think it did happen". Its description of AHV is a bit out-of-date (there is now exploration of heredity, translation etc in those hypotheses) but mostly I'm struck by passages like this:
On the controversial art direction of Mulan, in particular why it looks like they conflated Japanese and Chinese styles: (as always the answer is "did we forget who the Japanese cribbed half their stuff from")