e (they/them)
@certificates
no one of consequence. professional cybersecurity person and failed academic. queer feminist wittgensteinian artist who values privacy and is inspired by people.
i would say there are some key similarities to both reactions, and zooming in on them can illustrate some of the common motivations, power systems that animate both reactions, etc.
this whole thread sent me to the hp wiki, where i had the delightful experience of looking up what i assumed was some side comment character, only to find an interminable entry about someone who was sorted into "pudwickie" (?????). inferred eventually this is fantastic beasts bullshit. cmon w this
i wonder how much that had to do with his obvious eccentricity IRL (i say this from watching No Country for Old Men behind the scenes stuff). also, i will put my dad movie in this comment, b/c it's a bit too up its own film buff ass to be done in a quote post
personally, i feel like jung and his influence are more interesting to study as objects or indicators of things about our culture(s) than is his thought (which feels inconsequential). i want to ramble on, but in lieu of doing so i will recommend all readers watch Cronenberg's A Dangerous Method.
you click "translate" and a smug voice says "you know what this says about this guy. you know."
lol "got it in 1"... if corporate algorithms guide all your choices and create all your entertainment, indeed, you are living a life bereft of human imagination or meaning. THANKFULLY......
acab includes the acquaintance in the above scenario who ultimately decides not to tell your wife but is so fucking angry about losing those thirty minutes that they make this post on bsky to remind you.
Surge pricing discourse continues to weird me out... There's lots of places in lower Manhattan that rarely are congested, and others that are utter gridlock during the day.
earnest use of the word 'hysterical' is generally like, instant side-eye/skepticism, and puts the speaker on probation for like 5~15 years (forever, really).
I don't want to punish my analogy too hard, but indeed: when one's question gets paradoxical ("why do we tolerate this public intolerable trash!"), probably something within the question is doing too much work ("the same reason we tolerate the private!"). they avoid guy on bus, but forgive someone;)