Chrstphr S. Grdn
@chrstphrsg
partner • 3L @ BLS • photographer • writer • night owl • he/him summa: con law, the judiciary, due process, equal protection • analytic juris, fregean & performative semantics • cognition, episteme, ontology; parmenides, plato, aristotle
"Oh no. Just how upset were you to return home and discover FIFA was three corruptions in a trench coat?"
"The First Congress may legislate substantive constructions for the constitutional framework, but for reason of political inertia no future Congress may & the Court may declare this political question settled."
"Legislative enactments contrary to *prior* legislative enactments? What unheard of sovereign power is this people's Legislature supposed to be!"
Meghan and her beautiful Jewish friends in America reacting to some remark Trump just made about his "Jewish Accountant":
I get the Greatest Generation impulse yall, I really do, but I think you might undercut your point with takes like this by overlooking experiences of vets in the all-Black units. Takes like this kinda buy into the white lie that birthed the likes of Hegseths.
Google's targeted ads on YouTube have officially clocked me as a 3L I guess . . .
Most importantly, & maybe from the tiny Marx in my brain, but 'legal fiction' need not be pejorative—it's a recognition of the artificial, the legal gloss humans put on the material world & social relations. Neither good nor bad, fictions function to structure our social world.
Did his legal writing prof. lie to him or did mine to me? Did he misunderstand or is he lying to himself? I was not taught that the Statement of Facts in a brief is a "plain recitation of the facts." This is more of a memo; a brief is telling your clients' story—not lies, but *not* neutral.
Is going to a T25 school like going to Hogwarts? What is this fantasy world spoken of here?
OP: It is odd to me that society has converged on this One Signifier. QP: OP seems confused how signifiers work. I explain how the One Signifier can stand in opposition to the things signified & how we don't value the One Signifier per se, but rather a variety of personal experiences It signifies.
The 12th ed. (1884, post 14th Amend. rat.) is where a dominant common understanding (consensus?) shows evid. of breaking down; a further footnote (1) to footnote (a) that now accounts for political reaction to 14th Amend. ratification:
Torturing myself skimming some amici for Trump v. Barbara, & one I couldn’t help review was from Claremont Inst. (I know...). This quote & ref. to James Madison’s 1835 Essay on Sovereignty, under a section titled “The American Revolution Rejected the Feudal Doctrine of Birthright Subjectship... 1/
quite happy to mention I will be on the Exec. Articles Editors team for Vol. 92 & frankly thrilled to work with this whole group