Charlotte O'Brien
@cobrien
Professor of Law, University of York (she/her). Social security; EU law; discrimination; migration; social justice.
Judicial review, or judicial blessing ceremony? When @lewisgrahamlaw.bsky.social suggested co-authoring a case note on Jwanczuk, in which the UKSC underlines its distaste for human rights based challenges to primary social security legislation, I figuratively bit his hand off.
BUP publish a select range of general non-fiction; this project relied on the incredible support of FIVE anonymous peer reviewers (some quotes on first post, some below). Watch this space – and to those supportive of the ideas and the mission, please *let’s help change the brutalising discourse*!
WAAAH! I can't believe I'm typing this - but I have a book contract for a non-fiction book for a general audience with @brisunipress.bsky.social to challenge damaging rhetoric about immigration and welfare, arguing that xenophobic law-making goes hand-in-hand with punishing the poor and hurts us all
This is less a problem with the programme than it is a problem with the yawning gap in the debates. Women's rights were (and are) jeopardised by Brexit. (I wrote about this way back when: www.referendumanalysis.uk/eu-referendu...).
Redoleent of the UKSC’s recent Jwanczuk judgment, where it found that it was fine that Parliament thought it *better to refuse* bereavement support payment to the bereaved spouse of someone who had been too disabled to work before they died, than let them apply for it ‘at such a sensitive time’.
Tomorrow I am facing possibly the most terrifying, hardest moment of my career: talking about university and the law to a large group of 5-7 year olds. Pray for me. Am I planning on getting them to throw things? Why yes, yes I am.
"Write with fire, edit with ice (and come up for air)": Bob Ross! Dr Who! Descartes! Women in Public Spaces! The twin evils of genAI and headlice. And the quiet, transcendent magic of writing, all Open Access: nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/ni...
Is ‘legal science’ a thing - and can or should it be? Free webinar: Monday, 27th April, 17.00. Thanks to the University of Coimbra I’ll be talking about the importance of action research as a means of ‘experimenting with the law’. Deets & registration here: www.uc.pt/en/fduc/ucil...
Lady Hale appreciation post! Some UKSC judges might just retire to a life of lucrative commercial arbitration - but not her. She's committed to public service - educating students and the public about the law and human rights. Was terrifying but amazing to interview this ICON at York Law School.
Guess what the evidence shows? Disabled people pushed into deeper poverty are pushed *further from, not into, the workplace*. NEW REPORT, PACKED WITH EVIDENCE from community organisations. www.citizensadviceyork.org.uk/wp-content/u...
See here: *Side-stepping international law on the sly: The secret severing of the EU Settlement Scheme from the Withdrawal Agreement* plus.lexis.com/api/permalin... Please contact us if you do not have access to the journal and would like to read it!
@awelsh.bsky.social and I have a new article out in the Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law, official journal of the Immigration Law Practitioners' Association, exploring how (& asking why?) the UK government persists in undermining EU citizens’ long term Withdrawal Agreement rights.
This is a bizarre tale in which an overreaction to one, apparently unintended, minor, consequence has blown away any supposed security and certainty of the new regime. And results in 'maximum cake' - a scheme that is constitutive when it suits the UK government, and declaratory when it doesn't.
New Year Pop Quiz: Which of the 6 million + people with EU Settlement Scheme status has documentary confirmation that they are residing on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement? Astonishingly, the UK government's position appears to be: none of them. But wasn’t that the whole point of the EUSS?
The Grand Place in Brussels looking pretty grand - and for the first time I got to see a massive Xmas tree in the process of being decorated (with two mini cranes!). Also did a talk the next day to lawyers, academics and people from the EU Commission, about the exploitation of posted workers btw.
Another gap I commented on is the absence of backdating. Here, SCoSS have quoted my *evidence, drawn from advice-based research*, on periods when the risks of frictional poverty are higher - the immediate aftermath of childbirth being one.
SCoSS has now published its report. I see the @cpaguk.bsky.social had a similar key concern to me - that the 'top-up' model means that only those already in receipt of Universal Credit will benefit - you need an existing UC award to attach it to
Did you know that the Scottish Government has immediate plans to introduce a top-up benefit for families in Scotland affected by the UK's two child limit? Short 🧵 The Scottish Commission on Social Security scrutinised the draft regulations at pace this summer & I was invited to submit observations
I CANNOT WAIT to talk with @drproudman.bsky.social about her essential new book, ‘He Said, She Said’ as part of @yorkfestofideas.bsky.social, this evening. Expect shocking stories & a massive rallying cry against gender injustice in the legal system. I’m chairing; I’ll try my hardest not to swear.
Who *wouldn't* want full funding to do a PhD with any of our incredible academics at York Law School? Doing a PhD is so rewarding, and supervising is such a joy. Getting funding is a huge, and increasingly rare, opportunity. And York is LOVELY. www.york.ac.uk/law/study/fu...
The House of Lords European Affairs Committee has published our evidence outlining why a COMPLETE ABSENCE of documentary evidence of rights for EUSS holders in the UK – is a giant problem; *read it here*: committees.parliament.uk/writtenevide...
Third, the very real and present risk of this/future governments stripping away rights from those with SETTLED STATUS, unless they prove it is based on the WA. A Court of Appeal judge yesterday described this risk as ‘fanciful’. It is not. Lack of documentary evidence of rights led to Windrush.
First, the issue that has already cropped up (in Fertre; pic of @the3million.bsky.social team intervening). The UK government argues that ‘pre-settled status’ under the EU Settlement Scheme – *set up to implement the WA* is not a WA residence right, so holders are not entitled to equal treatment.
*Why* does it matter that NOBODY in the UK currently knows whether or not they have Withdrawal Agreement based residence rights? A Court of Appeal judge asked this yesterday. IT MATTERS, as our evidence to the HoL European Affairs Committee explains, for 3 reasons (spolier alert: one is Windrush):
What do we need to do before creating shiny new UK-EU reset rules? Make existing rules work properly! Our *newly published* response to the HoL consultation highlights a giant problem facing EUSS holders: a COMPLETE ABSENCE of evidence of WA rights. committees.parliament.uk/writtenevide...
How many UK Supreme Court judges do you think ever acted as lawyers for a claimant in a social security case? ZERO. *Extremely nervous* to announce this rather bolshy ('somewhat contentious' and 'robust in tone') piece in the JSSL. I argue there is a 'professional diversity deficit' in UKSC, AND...
We won the ESRC Celebrating Impact Prize for Outstanding Public Policy Impact last night. An inspiring evening, learning about projects making profound differences, highlighting the power of research (see: Yvonne McDermott Rees; @richardmoorhead.bsky.social; and many more)