the world if people who knew better didn't rush to give them those headlines

*world's longest sigh* 1) "focused on nutrition" like a serial killer focuses on his next victim, maybe, let's not pretend anything happening on that front is remotely good or well-intended 2) "critics say": did he explicitly stop monitoring these kinds of outbreaks or didn't he (he did)

the girlfriend/car seat post is correct for the rank and file, but there's only one origin story for anyone working for cato: "i did debate club, i have no morals, and now i'm being paid tons of money to say this"

it is a choice (whether intentional or not) to represent "[intensive bombing]" on "multiple parts of the country" over "consecutive days" as one arrow of the same weight as those used for reprisals, also to note iran is attacking u.s. military bases but coloring in and naming the whole countries

remember touchstone pictures? put out a bunch of movies you might know? at what age did you learn this is disney pictures in a trenchcoat, and was it today years old? anyway nobody knows or cares who owns and publishes what except industry press and sickos

me, every time the nyt uses "windfall" in connection with trump's thievery and corruption

is that a.i. slop laundered through universal images, a self-professed aggregator? seems like it might be! and that brings me back to: why on earth was this "art" chosen for the wired article? it's the fifth return on getty for pluto, the first four being new horizons images of the actual thing!

to getty! ... huh, i expected more quality control from them. this is wrong in so many ways: ❌ not labeled as illustration ❌ pluto quite famously not a planet ❌ only 1/3 the size of the moon ❌ not thought of as an asteroid or comet, especially if moon-sized! ❌ visited by a probe

like that might be an illustration but it's not a photograph! what two celestial bodies would be lined up and that close in size, much less have their backsides totally illuminated (as that has to be the sun off in the distance, facing the camera)? that's one hell of a flash!

hey, uh, @joshturek4iowa.bsky.social: quick reminder that the last democrat to hold the seat you're running for was tom harkin, whose dad was a COAL MINER no one has said this. no one is saying this. not sure where you're getting this cookie-cutter paint-by-numbers campaign garbage, but it sucks

i know it's npr so i shouldn't expect too much, but it's so tiring watching people constantly undersell what's actually going on the gop does not want this rule "reinterpreted" -- a completely undisputed thing courts do now i guess -- they want it nullified. they want it on the books but toothless

we all understand it would be quite the choice to describe him as "the candidate jizzed out of a kennedy" (or into, don't know/don't care) it's just as much of a choice to describe him as a "kennedy scion" and the others as "rival a.i. giants"

lol and again, i suck

oops forgot to alt text

the amy vanderbilt complete book of etiquette: a guide to contemporary living, revised and expanded by Letitia baldridge, 1978, presented without comment

if i worked for google search i would have to quit (probably true some time ago) like this is just embarrassing! bet y'all carpenters out there don't know these clutch lego techniques lolol

ok but the kids are right, it's a good joke 😂

"ai iS iNeViTaBLe" then at least PUT IT BACK IN THE OVEN UNTIL IT'S DONE and then get back to me you know, finish the product before you sell it, like 99% of previous products in human history

nine straight paragraphs of attacks on talarico, lovingly curated and presented without pushback, with a story about politics appended somewhere further down

bottoms without the bubble looking in the mirror like

what the fuck. what the fucking fuck. obviously didn't click on this but if pacs are presumably out here fundraising using texts that look like messages from suicidal loved ones, then i would like it to be flatly illegal for pacs to ask for money

sure, trump has played a role here, but american automakers have agency too and i don't know that i've seen them pushing back or partnering with environmental groups to get charging infrastructure, etc. in fact, the opposite!

the two dems who should be put on blast post-callais (pour encourager les autres) are, imo, cuck-chair-sitters mark warner and tim kaine callais was first heard in march 2025, this was a very known possibility, and yet they were arguing to weaken their own party's hand as recently as january

that one piece of mozzarella was like I'M OUT and it was an impressive tunnel job for as far as it got, tbh

and this is why she's gonna lose the primary "data centers are bad and we should keep them out of the state... except for this one community where they're saying the magic word: jobs" lady, what are your values?

i don't think i've seen the giant oval office lettering since it was taped up with printer paper, which suggests that when it happened, he was already so far gone that he couldn't find the door he'd used daily four years prior and it had to be labeled asap

mancy?

i'm sure there's lots of interesting coverage to be had on drug policy in america but this piece is clearly not interested in being part of that coverage, it's simply using drug policy as a convenient cudgel to beat one political party that's the only reason to have that D capitalized!