David Lewis
@davidlewis61
Graduated from 40 years as an appellate lawyer to being a gardener. Influenced by Voltaire: "Il faut cultiver notre jardin."
So, more than 646,000 voters IN FLORIDA, just voted for a DSA candidate because of this platform. Which part of it are YOU against? Or maybe YOU are in a minority.
I mean, this is a man (just this afternoon) who's "ready to wait" for a deal? Do you not pay attention? Do you just repeat what somebody covering for him feeds you?
Because you're a totalling unfeeling bot. Primed to make life dangerous for others. Real Americans knew there were uses for sawed-off shotguns, that's why they got banned. The uses were criminal.
You know, I'm a yellow dog Democrat, but this is just unforgivable. Schumer ought to be fired. The polls don't show an average tie. The averages are the GOP with 48%, Dems, 46.25%. Can't add and fart at the same time in Chuck's office, apparently (to paraphrase another Democrat).
Here's a cute example of anti-NYC bias. To get NYC onto this chart, they have to leave out 4/5 of the city.
I remember seeing the tears in Jesse's eyes at the celebration of Obama's election:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it was "a deal that WAS IN FACT PREVENTING Iran from getting a nuclear weapon," as shown by all the intelligence available to Donald Trump when he cancelled the agreement.
Well, glad you stepped in, even if off topic, for this putdown of the GOP Rep by Lawrence. The man has a way with the soundbite:
The early Times had the below, but later I saw it was changed substantially, including the use of the word "Racist."
Me or him? Because I, without reading your entire article, predicted his defense, as the last likely resort of a Police Chief with bad stats, and, it turns out, as his actual defense. Seen this before. Sorry if I wasn't more explicit, but I didn't think I'd be attacked.
They've been told they're the majority, so anything that indcates that's not so (when ever has MAGA had demonstrations like those over the week-end?) must be explained away, and they've got nothing.
This, from usually sensible TPM, seems just wrong. This law professor, who appears never to have prosecuted a case, much less a state-court murder, in his life, is wrong. Plenty of evidence available to the State, and feds will add more. talkingpointsmemo.com/morning-memo...
I hope I have not oversimplified Justice Stephens's statement which I'm attaching here. It's not from a footnote, but rather a dissenting opinion in Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 290:
And why should we take advice from a guy who's got the best insurance money can buy (but that we pay for) and who is basically getting paid by the insurers and other health care providers whom he's protecting here.
Not sure about the chronology here, but this guy became anti-fa at an early age.