Erik Eklund
@eklundsays
3x award-winning Nabokov specialist literature and theology at Northwest research fellow, Russian stuff at Northwestern author, AND THEN NOTHING (2026) great at parking “The dumbest smart person I’ve ever met” my beloved wife
Ten years playing guitar together, playing bars wherever, getting lost in bad weather, etc. etc. etc.
Nabokov Studies 20 (2025) has now been published and is currently Open Access. It includes an introduction by General Editor Zoran Kuzmanovich and Associate Editor, me. 🙃 Check it out at muse.jhu.edu/issue/56115.
Oh the weird places Nabokov may make you go. Little known fact: Nabokov preferred William James to his brother Henry James.
I don’t know these buildings. I think I am lost. Would you be good enough to take me home? Don’t mind me, just self-soothing.
They almost let me get away with making Nabokov the “final word” on the Trinity. So close!
My dream home and after more than five years they’re still not done. And then that view. Kill me.
Based on my award-winning dissertation, my first book—And Then Nothing: Remapping Literature and Theology in Vladimir Nabokov’s Pale Fire—is now *forthcoming* from Cascade Books series in philosophical theology and theory, Veritas.
I am absolutely elated beyond belief to share that the International Vladimir Nabokov Society has awarded my PhD dissertation, “A Triptych of Bottomless Light: Repetition, Originality & Transcendence in Nabokov’s Pale Fire,” the 2024 Zoran Kuzmanovich Prize! thenabokovian.org/news/2024-iv...
The best part is being the one religion and literature person at a religion or literature conference and the other thing gets brought up. “You’re assuming the other thing is stable and we really have no idea what the fuck is going on.”
I’ve always assumed that here, in Michelangelo’s “Creation of Man,” that God is reaching out his hand to Adam, but now I think the divine touch has already occurred, that what we see here is the divine withdrawal, as Adam is already animate, already dying.
I’m not crying, you’re crying. This, by Daniel Adam Lightsey, from the inaugural issue of the Northwestern University Studies in Russian Philosophy, Literature, and Religious Thought, titled “Le style c’est l’homme: Sergii Bulgakov, Vladimir Nabokov, & the Artist’s Podvig.”
Antony of Egypt. Because of the ways he is changed by and changes with the artists he captivated—most notably his literacy. Also, modern fiction after Flaubert, from him to Morrison, is utterly unthinkable without Antony’s strange intercession.