I expect them to be destroyed because the billionaire who forced them to pull the report said she would. Whether or not they get destroyed whilst defending human rights or sullying their own reputation is up to them.

this one's good.

I made the terminology mistake by questioning a word choice that conflates Jews with Nazis? You can Google the term you used yourself and scroll possibly forever without finding a reference to the German American Bund, and countless references to the Jewish Labor Bund.

sigh

Also deeply hilarious (read: fucked) that this "win for the rights of women" presumes male pronouns in reference to the general idea of an employer.

fuck me, I just read the actual article (horrible, obviously), it ends on this line which so bizarrely replaces "Jew" in a Shakespeare quote with "posh person"??? There's so little irony it's hard to tell if she realises she's done it, and the politics of it are beyond fucked.

Just to hammer home what a horrible shit she is, this article is a direct response to this other article published a few days earlier. The study was conducted in Manchester too, which on a national level I don't think people would consider a "posh" place, but there's been a lot of transplants lately

Reminder that you can Google the byline for articles like this! Their authors actually have LinkedIn and X and Instagram profiles with profile pictures, and sometimes they even have video interviews! That way if you see them in the streets you can commend them on their great journalism!

Look at this unsourced drivel. It's specifically talking about super market ready meals. The majority of these are below 550 calories. If you were to eat 3 meals of 550 calories or less, we're talking 1650 calories with a daily recommendation of 2500. This is completely vibes based.

I think it's a bit of both. Object personification is human, but marketers know this much better than your average person.

Screenshot with alt text so people don't have to sift through