Josh Habgood-Coote
@impractknow
Philosopher | practical knowledge, collective inquiry, philosophy of technology | spends too much time running (picture eliot.ely)
Italians! I'm translating a pesto recipe from the 1890s (for reasons). Can I get a check of whether this is rightish? I have extremely little Italian, and recipe nuance is difficult to get right!
Oh great, British education policy since 1944 has been organised around the Myth of the Metals.
Reading John Ruskin is weird because one minute you're reading about flying buttresses, and then about how the laws of nature are compatible with divine omnipotence because reality is God's self-imposed game and what if Elephants had bones made of diamond???
Visma-Lease a bike cycling team has a new mascot (squints) who seems to be sexy gritty?
And I got waay too into scrolling c1800 maps of east London where everything beyond Bethnal Green is allotments (you can literally see garden designs if you scroll in!) digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/887443...
I also went down a whole rabbit hole trying to find out exactly what flowers Spitalfields silk weavers grew and trying to match them to their cloth designs. which was how I found out about the self-taught designer Anna Maria Garthwaite www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/blue-p...
A couple of years ago I started wondering why I was spending so much time on hobbies cosplaying obsolete jobs. This is a go at an answer: I'm in the grips of *skill nostalgia*, and the problem is to avoid it becoming reactionary. It turns out John Ruskin (??) has the answer aeon.co/essays/the-r...
My dahlias (which I bought after reading about the gardens of Spitalfields) have not quite budded after being brutalised by slugs for months
I wrote about 19th century silk weavers growing flowers, hobby obsessions, and the choice between revolutionary and reactionary nostalgia in Aeon aeon.co/essays/the-r...
This is just the quiet part out loud; this is what google want readers to take seriously. But nowhere is this pushed back on. It's all 'google is struggling with the pressure to compete for profitability', not 'this company is causing environmental damage and rolling out unsafe products.
The choice of experts is also *interesting*. We get a little bit of AI ethics, with Gebru, Boulamwini, and Mitchell shouted out, but no quotes from anyone in what I'd think of as critical technology studies. All of the quotes are from Oxford people tied to the OII or Institute for Ethics in Ai.
The position taken up in both of these passages is that technologies don't have values, because they get swamped by the values of their users. This is a WILD position in the philosophy of technology. There's no sensible defence of it.
The sentences are my non-Irish speaking attempt to get all of the persons of the imperative mood in one place
Ok! First and third person imperative: how would you describe the speech act (the thing the speaker is doing) most naturally associated with these sentences? (I've cut off the grammar information). The exact sentence doesn't matter, 'shops' might be clearer than 'protest'
How is this not Amskell suggesting that chatbots assert Moorean sentences?
Ted Chiang confirmed fictionalist about AI speech www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2...
Doing some research on flowers and found these drawings of cloth workers in Bethnal Green in the 1860s