Joshua Weitz
@joshuasweitz
Professor of Biology & Institute for Health Computing, U of Maryland; explores how viruses impact human & environmental health; 'Asymptomatic' (JHU Press & 'Science Matters' (
Oh and measles... there are already more documented cases in 2026 in the US than in all of last year (and last year had the highest number in 25+ years). www.cdc.gov/measles/data...
60,000+ comments on OMB’s proposal to politicize grants. The lesson: speak up. It makes a difference & it’s not over yet. 🎁 wapo.st/44YL4t1
LinkedIn is evolving and maturing. It's not just congratulations anymore! Who knew that saying universities do science would be so triggering - live and learn!
New Science & Community Impacts Mapping Project (#SCIMaP) analysis on the impact of the WH plan to eliminate NSF's Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences directorate. @malar0ne.bsky.social @asinclair.bsky.social @cl10.bsky.social @alexmusicwrites.bsky.social scienceimpacts.org/insights/SBE...
Dashboard with analysis of comments & github source link omb-financial-assistance-comments.netlify.app
Viruses of Microbes 2026 in Prague #VoM2026 Immersive conference spanning cells, populations, and ecosystems including basic and translational discoveries... ... and now mobilizing well beyond the conference hall. h/t @pavol.bsky.social
As a @washingtonpost.com subscriber and admirer of many of their news team, it is shocking (but not surprising) to read this nihilistic and Orwellian OpEd from Scott Atlas: adviser to Trump I, member of the Hoover Institution at Stanford who wants to literally: "Abolish the NIH" wapo.st/4eWDsMf 🧵
Which means, in practice, milder diseases (when considering the term 'mild' at individual scales) can lead to far worse population scale outcomes. academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Congratulations to @malar0ne.bsky.social who was awarded a Best Talk prize for her #SCIMaP presentation on 'Widespread Economic Impacts of Federal Research Cuts in Local Communities' at the International Conference on the Science of Science and Innovation: icssi.org
Now imagine scaling up a single costly, wasteful, and flawed project to tens of billions of dollars in award decisions at NIH, NSF + more that are currently made by domain experts and at risk - via proposed OMB rules - of being made by political officials to fulfill administration priorities.
Dan is an excellent, rigorous, and committed voice with a range that spans people, systems, and science. His last three stories given you some sense of what SciAm and LabX just lost and what we will lose collectively without institutions & the people who can tell stories about why science matters.
If Congress is serious about advancing science, it must look beyond top-line budgets and engage now when rules for how research budgets are prioritized, allocated, and spent are at risk of becoming entirely politicized. @standupforscience.net fight2win.standupforscience.net?_gl=1*1wb02h....
At minimum the paper needs full details of the mathematical model w/access to Supplementary Information so that the community can assess and weigh in; the links to the supplementary figures appear broken and first supp is clearly mislinked... CDC modeling capacity should not be 10+ years back.
And yes branching process can generate noise (which seems appealing from a 'realism' perspective), but if you run them without (local) susceptible depletion then they stop representing things to close to reality quite quickly. There are other options. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Many ways to raise your voice & the time is now, made easier & systematic by @standupforscience.net: fight2win.standupforscience.net?_gl=1*13p5tf....
Delighted to share news that @weitz-group.bsky.social postdoc @juliepourtois.bsky.social has been selected along with Spencer Hobson-Gutierrez & James Richardson as inaugural Quantitative Biology Initiative Postdoctoral Fellows at the University of Maryland, Biology: biology.umd.edu/news/umds-qu...
Correct. fight2win.standupforscience.net @standupforscience.net @cdelawalla.bsky.social
Many thanks to the entire team, including P. Fremont, @beckettstephen.bsky.social, D. Muratore, @d2mory.bsky.social, E. Carr, O. Jahn, C. Follett, @dtalmy.bsky.social, D. Lindell, S. Dutkiewicz, and the Simons Foundation for critical funding and support. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6... /🧵
But in building vDarwin, we wanted to move beyond a single modality of cell fate outcomes and explore the feedback of lysates on the community dynamics.We did so by including a parameter that can shift the balance of lysates towards shunt vs. shuttle processes.
Indeed, one of the first pieces of evidence that we were on the right track was the vDarwin could recapitulate densities that are consistent with open ocean observations and existing Darwin output (without viruses), further suggesting that virus-free models have embedded virus effects implicitly.
This is what vDarwin now offers: enabling simulations to directly explore the impacts of explicit inclusion of virus infection, lysis, and loss as part of a 3D global circulation model, part of the larger "Darwin" project. darwinproject.mit.edu
then assembling and analyzing viral and microbial abundances in global ocean datasets to help ground efforts to compare results from theory to in situ measurements; www.nature.com/articles/nmi...
In fact, the challenge was immense. This working group managed to take major steps in the direction of integration, first characterizing the elemental composition of virus particles and its impact on shifting concentrations of nutrients as a result of lysis; www.nature.com/articles/nrm...
The project has a long origin story, dating back at least 15 years, when @labwilhelm.bsky.social and I co-organized a NIMBioS working group on 'Ocean Viral Dynamics'. legacy.nimbios.org//workinggrou... (bonus points for recognizing who's who!)
Viruses are highly abundant in the oceans, but there is one place you won't typically find them: in global ocean ecosystem models... until now. Introducing "vDarwin", an explicit integration of viruses into the MITgcm/Darwin global ecosystem framework: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6... a 🧵
Jan 16, 2026: The New Vision from NIAID Taubenberger, Powers and Bhattacharya May 21, 2026: Taubenberger is out, more in @statnews.com via @helenbranswell.bsky.social & @aniloza.bsky.social www.statnews.com/2026/05/21/n...
We need more conversations, not less. More public engagement, rather than hiding and hoping that the threat will dissipate. More frank discussions of the ongoing harm and the missed opportunities to transform our world for the better. And we cannot wait until 2029.
Yes, new leaders are coming, but this declaration indicates a willful disregard for facts and a sign that NASEM is more interested in signaling that it will play ball rather than address cuts to funding, loss of programs and people, and the dismantling of independence in agencies.
Explain the steady funding and cuts being considered to the more than 25,000 experts no longer working in federal agencies to oversee, perform, and enable R&D: www.nature.com/immersive/d4...
Explain the steady funding and cuts being considered to anyone who has applied for a NIH R01 grant. Top-scored grants with 10% percentile used to be nearly certain to be funded. Now? A coin flip. joshuasweitz.substack.com/p/moving-the...