Yeah, that really didn't go well for them. If you want to do PR for the royals, try posing with someone who is actually loved or popular?

Feels appropriate for a number of reasons

I take it Chait's on a few block lists? Can't miss-click if you can't see the post.

Just read the original thread. Wow.

We don't share the same god, you poisonous little fascist.

The ad was just a button saying "sign in here." Pure scam.

@edzitron.com it's official, I am you apparently

Just realised who Sam Altman reminds me of

If you pay for the Guardian or NYT you are also getting mostly lies on some subjects. And don't even get me started on the Telegraph. Good journalists deserve to be paid, but money is not a substitute for critically appraising your sources of information.

Fixed it for you

Open goal

The drone in question

This is good and necessary (and combined aircon/heating is a real win). But am I wrong to worry that if the AMOC slowdown is real, we may find ourselves in a colder rather than warmer climate?

I know, journalists have to get paid. But this seems to be an increasing trend of "pay to avoid negative consequences" where intrusive advertising is used as a tool to extract subscription revenue. See also YT music, where the adverts I got were mostly "pay us to remove this advert."

It's giving

PSA for people as uninformed as me

Deep cut, but here's the origin

Sometimes it's worth stating the obvious. People hate AI content. ellipsus.com/blog/survey-...

Thank you. She was 9yo. Brain tumor. Had an operation to remove it but just too much to recover from 🙁

Just saying.

I'm so sorry. I don't have a lot of art in my camera roll, but here's a photo I took of a winter aconite from our garden after the rain.

1. Follower counts on X I understand are unrepresentative, and reach is at the mercy of the algorithm 2. If you think Bsky denizens are horrible compared to X, you're telling on yourself

Love it! We have similar, but ours is a bit of a monster (15kW)