Eric Blair
@protecttruth
Status Quo Politics is holding us back. Who will call for a big fight, and big change? The status quo cannot hold. SCOTUS delenda est
Jamie Metzl “has been called "the original COVID-19 whistleblower" for his efforts calling for a full investigation into pandemic origins…” This guy is a crank. The easiest game in town today is “I’m a lifelong Democrat. But here’s why Democrats are bad.” As @nytpitchbot.bsky.social says.
What happens when you're too lazy to travel for diner safaris to talk to Trump voters? You use a focus group to bring them in. Patrick Healy (of Clinton Cackle fame) developed this focus group innovative journalism strategy, and now K Soltis Anderson, a Republican operative, is part of it.
“This brings me to a final point - the heavily leftward-biased traditional media (but also those on the right) is at fault for much of this. Objective facts are pushed aside, and spin is put in their place. Trump can do no right (or wrong).“
I am dead serious. Trump isn’t impeached now because a big slice of the country believes this. Give it a read
Seeing this kind of comment a lot, and waiting for this poster to discover that linear time exists. 2026 is indeed after 2024, it turns out! (this is about the @maragay.bsky.social observation that the political establishment is out of touch with voters.)
It's crisis posture over at NYT due to the subpoenas. Presented without comment @nataliekorach.bsky.social at @status.news www.status.news/p/new-york-t...
Primary elections are not majoritarian democracy, they exist to choose the best candidate for a general election and they are even bad at that.
Bad move by Clinton, Obama, and Biden. Now is not the time for fuzzy bipartisanship with fascist enablers. Now is the time for going to war against Republican elites like GW Bush. We must have a Truth and Reconciliation process first. THEN we can have bipartisanship again. Not now.
“Author at the Federalist” “After working in Republican politics in Minnesota…”
the sourcing is also 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 If I read this right, they're telling a story someone in the room gave them. (Can't be an aide overhearing on speaker; they're describing the room layout.) And it doesn't seem like Vance.
ok, you'll say, this is the Times Magazine. And NYT Mag has always had more freedom to tell the truth about Trump than the bothsides Kahn/Sulzberger Politics section. That's right. But this is written by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, access and power-deferential journalists extraordinaire.
people who in essence call for ethnic cleansing in Israel I will block. there are still liberals there who believe in human rights. The path forward is supporting people who love peace, Israelis and palestinians
I am not defending the Pod Save guys. For example they legitimize Musk and Twitter by being unable to take criticism here. But how is this anything other than wrecking? These are sweeping statements that inflame division.
also this is good news. It is essential that Fetterman votes for Schumer or his replacement
It is either a person with a loose grasp of reality or a bot/manipulation account. etiher way it’s using Modi/South Indian identity politics (hindutva) to defend Khanna and slam AOC
nearly a decade ago this was common wisdom, accepted amongst pundits. “a bunch of mediocrities with puffed-up credentials due to affirmative action for conservatives” Let’s get back to saying that!
I believe in redemption, but also at some point filling the WaPo podcast with radical libertarian Koch economists, especially those who referred approvingly to "gentle silent rape" in a contrarian/inflammatory effort, we reach a limit, right?
2026 rule of headlines: Any headline “I’m a Democrat!! Here’s why X“ in big media is a lock-down rock-solid guarantee that the article is badly argued garbage.
also, re: Mona Charen 'No results found for "supreme court from:monacharen.bsky.social".' It is basically impossible to oppose Trump today without opposing this Supreme Court
Haha "Congress" Haha What liars the people who write the headlines at NYT are.
Utter cowardice from the NYT headlines division. "Supreme Court Further Weakens Voting Rights Act, Igniting Political Scramble" "justices split along ideological lines" "Civil Rights Leaders [oh, just them?] See the Ruling as a 'Betrayal'" "Republican" mentioned exactly zero times
“Republican billionaires want to abolish retirement and have you work until you literally die on the job”
Al Green lost a primary because he was redistricted by Texas Republicans, not because of his stance on impeachment, for god’s sake
"Gas prices SLIDE two cents" kidding me? Strong verbs, in the tank for Trump (and the powerful)
Watching CNN. It's wildly in the tank for Trump and Republicans. - Spotlighting Vance - Strong verbs: "Vance leads peace talks" - Positive spin: "US clearing Hormuz mines" - Showing a huge victory US "peace proposal" (Iran ends nukes, Hormuz reopen) - which is not what Iran will agree to
Excellent lede and pretty good headline on this story from Robert Jimison today in NYT.
This article does everything it possibly can to pretend these are normal times and portray Trump as a normal president. It‘s wrong and it’s harmful. It deceives readers. Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman bend over so far to portray Trumpers as statesmen that their foreheads are on the floor.