Scale Star Legal

@scalestar

Discussing law and politics. #Justice #Democracy #AbolishICE #StopFascism! #EndWars #PreventCorruption

55 Siguiendo3793 Seguidores626 Publicaciones

YouTube YouTube YouTube YouTube Bluesky

¿Es tu perfil?Reclámalo y scalestar.dirty.social es tuyo.Reclamar perfil

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Apr 30

Gerrymandering ensures total count doesn't change who wins the seat. If mapmakers create a "safe district" for a party, they've mathematically set the outcome. Even if 1000s vote for the other side, if a district is designed to guarantee a win for 1st party, later votes cannot shift result #cheating

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Jan 13

If you want to say Jonathan Ross "only planned on intimidating Renee at gunpoint", well, to pull your weapon on someone to intimidate (*especially* since there was no valid reason by the end of it) violates innumerable laws, regardless of the murder. Literally no justification whatsoever; a felon.

Summary
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law: Violates 18 U.S.C. § 242 when an officer willfully deprives a person of constitutional rights while acting in an official capacity.

Second-Degree Assault (MN): Minnesota Statute 609.222 classifies using a dangerous weapon to cause fear of immediate bodily harm as a felony.

Threats of Violence (MN): Minnesota Statute 609.713 prohibits threats intended to terrorize or cause extreme fear.

Public Officer Misconduct (MN): Minnesota Statute 609.43 criminalizes acts by public officers that knowingly exceed lawful authority.

Dangerous Weapon Display (MN): Minnesota Statute 609.66 prohibits intentionally pointing a firearm at another person, loaded or unloaded.

Fourth Amendment Excessive Force: Pointing a firearm without a reasonable threat constitutes an unreasonable seizure.

First Amendment Retaliation: Using a weapon in response to protected speech is unlawful retaliation.

ICE Firearms Policy Violation: ICE Directive 19009.3 limits firearm display to situations involving a reasonable necessity for deadly force.

Force Proportionality Violations: Law enforcement standards require force proportional to the threat; verbal insults never justify lethal force.

ICE Use-of-Force Standards: ICE Standard 2.15 prohibits force or threats of force for intimidation.

Civil Liability – Federal Agents: Bivens allows personal lawsuits against federal officers for constitutional violations.

Civil Liability – Local Officers: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 imposes liability for excessive force or intimidation.

Professional Ethics Violations: Minnesota POST Board violations may result in license revocation and permanent disqualification.

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Jan 12

Self-defense doesn't work, he says, because he's using a weapon against an unarmed and non-attacking woman, where a reasonable person would not have shot them. The full breakdown of what I found to be uniquely important for the case is here:

Summary:
1. 15:40 No withdrawal or communication of withdrawal, yet necessary in cases like this, by the one who instigated the situation
2. 15:55 Had reasonable grounds for retreat, chose to shoot the woman instead
3. 7:30 He went in front of the car to record; choosing to record prevented him from getting out of the way (was able to retreat, but chose to kill)
4. 17:11 He can’t use self-defense because he used a weapon against an unarmed, non-attacking woman, where a reasonable person would have simply moved away
5. 17:30 He suspects the state may excuse the decision based on a previous incident (not logical—traumatized people should not be on staff, negating viability IMO. The June 2025 scene showed insufficient ethics and care for human life, disqualifying trauma as justification)
6. 8:34 To use deadly force, he must classify himself as a “peace officer,” which he isn’t
7. If he were classified as a “peace officer,” he must follow Minnesota Code Section 609.066, including:
i. Protecting life: Prevent imminent death or great bodily harm (not occurring; he created the situation)
ii. Preventing escape: Stop a suspect believed to have used or threatened deadly force (she did not)
iii. Preventing future harm: Apprehend someone likely to cause death or injury (he could have moved away)
iv. Articulating danger: Identify a specific, clear threat(not done)
v. Reasonable perspective: Judged by what a reasonable officer would do—not hindsight (no reasonable person would see reasonability here, per Legal Eagle 16:36)
8. 18:15 Responsibility to check the injury status of the lethally injured person; failure carries 2 years and a $4,000 fine. He may claim “I was whisked away.”
9. 18:44 Agents who deterred medical assistance will be prosecuted under 609.50 with a 5-year sentence per agent and a $10K fine
10. 21:40 Final question: is killing “proper” for carrying out federal immigration law? (Anyone aware of Federal Fiasco as illegal would know it was not “proper”)

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Dec 23

Bullet point breakdown

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Nov 29

Trump hopes that by committing as many violations of U.S. law as possible, he will "flood the zone" and never be liable for a single one with delusional logic. Here are 195 violations he's committed in the year 2025 alone. We will hold him accountable for each one. www.youtube.com/watch?v=hybL...

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Nov 13

Epstein tried to bust Trump in an email to Wolf, like taking down Barty Crouch Jr., but instead the government are treating Trump like Snape: suspicious, misunderstood, and protected. Which side are you on: the expose or the cover-up? www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm6p...

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Oct 16

5:00-6:43 "These republicans have lost their fu%$3n minds and they are going fu%#3n wild. Not only are they not playing fair, but they are announcing they are no longer going to play fair....[what Trump's doing with the electorate] will officially make it totalitarian rule" youtu.be/tO7sAHMCmeM

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Oct 11

4 Republicans have signed on to force a vote. Speaker Johnson is even refusing to swear in newly-elected Rep. Grihalva, who would be the 218th vote needed to trigger the discharge petition. Recent estate file releases have already implicated Bannon, Thiel & Musk. What else is Trump trying to hide?

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Oct 11

🚨 BREAKING: Trump & his chief of staff are calling GOP members and threatening them over the Epstein files discharge petition. "If you sign on, it's considered a hostile act. You'll never get anything again. We're going to cut you off." Why so desperate to block these files?

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Oct 4

Trump is hiding from his Epstein scandal. That's why he had the "Best Friends Forever" statue illegally removed from the National Mall. But it's BACK. Worth noting the statue had a permit until Sept 28. Park Police removed it Sept 24 at 5:30 AM WITHOUT the required 24-hour notice #FreeSpeech

Scale Star Legal@scalestar· Oct 3

Trump didn’t ‘reverse’ the cuts, a judge ruled against him. But he’s pretending it was his decision, because admitting limits on his power would shatter the strongman image he’s desperate to project.