Not true: www.monticello.org/topics/spuri...

How does this headline make it past your spell-check @nytimes.com ?

You make a good point, but according to the NY Times, it would require a veto.

He also was kind enough to explain exactly how to work around the decision.

It's not just about party. It's pro-authoritarianism vs. anti-authoritarianism. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...

Come on, determination of citizenship will be extremely straightforward...

Also Cornell...

It's a mystery.

That he deserved his Daddy's love?

And it's even worse when the question is posed directly about Trump.

Seems to pretty reasonably fit the definition--are you sure this is the hill you want to be assassinated on? www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/a...

Or, for that matter, that *this* guy is somehow a champion of the poor!

No need to choose...

Now that's a headline. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/01/u...

Why do you claim that older voters "are the mainstay of Trump's support" when they only broke toward him 51-48? Seems like a much more valid--and apt--assertion would be to describe the un/under-educated as the mainstay of Trump's support.

Not just old, though.

Are you sure about that "registered Republican" part? That's not what the NY times says--