Thomas Steinke
@stein
Researcher in computer science, math, machine learning, (differential) privacy, AI, etc. at Anthropic. Kiwi🇳🇿 in California🇺🇸
What does “tokens per second per request” mean?? www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Oh yeah I remember that. I remember showing up at the conference venue to present my poster in swim gear, still wet from snorkeling. 😅
I’m attending COLT 2026 in San Diego. You can see the beach from the conference venue; not sure if that’s a good thing. 🤔 learningtheory.org/colt2026/
A handsome red bike, abandoned. By a busy road, outside my home. Locked to a tow away sign. What happened to its owner? Not even a thief has come for it. What will the HOA do? I see it daily and wonder.
Here's an example of a "hallucinated" citation from a decade ago (i.e. pre-LLMs). The same bad citation appeared in multiple papers. I eventually traced the source to Google Scholar (and it's now fixed).
Some people are still debating whether or not LLMs are "useful," so let's stake out one clear use case: LLMs are useful for translating between languages. That includes translating between natural languages (e.g. Spanish to English) and, more recently, to formal languages (e.g. English to Python).
I like spotting license plates from interesting states. This one was notably interesting.
Amazon sent me an empty/broken package. I'm trying to get my money back, but there's no explicit option for this. I may have to "return" the item by sending an empty package back.
The cost of living is out of control: A bag of ice costs $4 and my local supermarket is out of stock. This is why we need Greenland.
TIL that the etymology of "California" is plausibly related to "Caliphate".
IMHO, the best analog to the AI bubble is the dotcom bubble. Yes, the internet proved to be economically transformative, but there was still a bubble. Companies made a lot of money in the end, but it wasn't necessarily the ones that people expected -- e.g., see CISCO:
Doing linear algebra in finite fields is fun because numerical instability doesn't exist. Alas, library support is limited, so you may find yourself writing your own Gaussian elimination.
I'm a fan of the Jensen proof. It generalizes to prove Hölder's inequality:
Three proofs of Cauchy-Schwarz. ⟨x,y⟩ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥ Are there any others you know of?
Suppose X,Y,Z,W are independent standard Gaussians. Then X·Y+W·Z has a standard Laplace distribution. Similarly, Z·√(X^2+Y^2) has a standard Laplace distribution
As an application of this, we get to prove concentrated differential privacy for the restricted Gaussian mechanism. E.g. if you have a bounded query and add Gaussian noise, you can condition the noisy output to also be bounded without any loss in privacy parameters. 😁
Here's an application using the Log Sobolev Inequality for strongly log-concave distributions to bound KL divergence which can thus be converted to a bound on Rényi divergence.
You can bound Rényi divergences in terms of KL divergences for tilted distributions. This is useful e.g. for Gaussians, where tilting just corresponds to shifting the distribution.
There are also rod cells in your retina. In principle these give you a 4th dimension for perceiving colour. But they are for peripheral & night vision, so we don't perceive a 4th color dimension. 🤷
Colours correspond to infinite-dimensional vectors, since there are infinitely many wavelengths of light. But humans can only perceive a three-dimensional projection of colour (red, green, & blue). What's interesting is that it's *not* an orthogonal projection. Here's a plot of the basis vectors.
Taking α→1 gives a triangle inequality for KL divergence. This can also be proved using my favourite lemma. 😁