Tim Ackermann
@timack
Patent & trademark attorney with over 25 years experience in helping protect businesses' trademark & patent rights. (Former @ntxip on you know where)
Certainly seems like opposer could have gotten it in, if it had paid attention to the rules...
That's what it should have done. That's what the reporting should say. But notice that OAI didn't really admit it, at least not in the quote. Still trying to divert blame.
Well, this is awful. Even if one doesn't use the AI/LLM summaries, other people do and this is just poisoning that well.
16% increase in Google Workspace fees because it's jamming a bunch of AI down our gullets.... And if it's so 'valuable' why isn't Google continuing to charge for it? Why is it, instead, charging *everyone* $2/month extra (whether you want or need it)?
Professor, this is what I saw reported. There was an existing "character" that was described as a psychiatrist. That does not make it sound like the system had to be pushed into falsely stating that it could practice medicine. buckscountybeacon.com/2026/05/penn...
One wonders how these longshot (sub-35%) military/defense bets pay off so frequently...
And this explanation (excuse) doesn't really address the issue: the city doesn't give permission for some private gymnastic studio, and the permission the studio evidently did give was for maintenance, not sales demos.
Oh yes. Company claims it only scrapes public meetings - i.e. ones that anyone can join. But there's a whole discussion in there about getting access via browser extensions (such as note-taking apps) that users do not realize are granting such access.
Not crazy about the framing of the AI agents' actions as "lying" or "scheming" when the agents lack consciousness. But the underlying problems - disregard of instructions and falsehoods - are concerning.