Ken
@whatabouttheken
Mostly a politics/policy reply guy. May post about various nerdy/techy interests from time to time.
Here's the study. Note it is a preliminary finding and more rigorous controls are required to confirm it... www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Even Wikipedia acknowledges a genocide at this point. If you wanna call it specious then take it up with the many citations.
They try to argue that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" actually means "has parents who are permanently domiciled in the US" and cite a bunch of non-authoritative opinions and quotes out of context, ignoring that Wong Kim Arc *explicitly* disagrees with them.
Come on politico, it's not a "reversal." It's not "high-minded rhetoric." Democrats are still 100% in favor of independent redistricting, but it needs to be a requirement for both parties, and Dems have put forward bills to require it. The Republicans shot them down.
Their analysis depends really strongly on offshore wind power... Showing almost no storage needed and mainly relying on biomass for intermittent issues? Is offshore wind really that reliable? Seems very region specific then...
That chart really doesn't tell the whole story. Natural gas has actually increased over the period and they're still burning a decent amount of coal
There have been plenty of previous periods of wage stagnation, generally after recessions. Sentiment dips a bit but never this drastically, this fast. What's different this time?
It violates the "purpose and policy" section of the WPA, which requires there having been an emergency attack on the US first, but that doesn't have any enforcement mechanism beyond Congress directing the president to withdraw.
I don't think it's any more complex than people *really* hate having to make hard decisions. And they love having a narrative that makes them feel morally superior about it, when in reality they're just the dog in the comic.
The previous link I shared outlines the procedure. The members-elect vote for a new speaker before they're sworn in. Once the speaker is elected and sworn in, he/she then administers the oath to all the other members.
This isn't true. First thing that happens is either the clerk or sgt at arms presides over the election of a new speaker. Only after that does the new speaker swear in the rest of the members. www.congress.gov/crs-product/...
Unfortunately the whole article is behind a spamwall and I don't feel like giving out my email today.
If it's completely separate from campaign funds, then why does it "make her physically nauseous" to think about all the good that campaign funds could be doing? What's the point of this statement from her?
"The electromagnetic field is not the fundamental description of electromagnetism, but the electromagnetic potential from which it derives"