(((Asa Zernik)))
@asazernik
Israeli-American techie scum. Almost became political operative scum, hence tweeting. RP without comment equals endorsement of post only, not source account.
קשה להפריד בין תוצאות של פוסט-קורונה, הפיכה משפטית, ומלחמה. כפי שאני מפרש את המספרים, הייתה מגמת עלייה במספרים אחרי השפל של הקורונה שכנראה נבעה מההפיכה המשפטית, ולמלחמה לא היה תפקיד מרכזי. www.ynet.co.il/news/article...
Okay but also the actual headlines are calling it "Islamist" (associated with the ideology) not "Islamic" (associated with the religion). e.g.
The craziest part to me is this. Contemporaneous to German Wunderwaffe madness, but because it was the US they could actually follow through.
Bibi always makes a big deal out of being respected abroad, unlike those lefty lightweights. These were his election ads in '19 ("a different league")
Not sure about taxis, but the paper notes that the number is very similar for Lyft/Uber
That is how he *defines* bullshit jobs in the essay. If he classes if as a bullshit job, that is what he thinks about it.
My premises are 1 and 2 as listed above. Your issue, as I gather from other parts of this discussion, is that you *do not agree* with item 1; that is, you do not think that Iran could be doing more economic damage to the US than it currently is through Hormuz.
This holds for Europe. But as a great TikToker has pointed out, all American cities are either New York or Houston. www.tiktok.com/@itspondless...
Hot history take - the entire period from 1912-1921 or so should be periodized as one long Balkan Wars period, which just happens to coincide with the First World War. Inspired by this Greek war memorial.
It started with this - a direct reference to pro-Hamas rhetoric, which started EXTREMELY early.
I don't think the paper sees it as material: it presents this as being just as much a question of worldview and status and hierarchy as anything material.
Both on my feed (which is the usual way people discover posts) and on his profile (screenshotted below) the two posts appear immediately one after another. I'm extremely confused by what method you use this site where the second post is "miles" beneath the first one.
Ooooh. So what you intended to say was "yes I agree it was bad". Communications tip! When someone is talking about atrocities done at one time, and your response is to bring up atrocities 45 years later with a rhetorical question like this...
Though note that this was in the context of describing an imperial system he despised
Their logo looks like the Chevron logo. (Also, following all the FARA rules I see.)
Politically motivated oppo dumps are good, actually. Especially in primaries, where they weed out problematic candidates before the other party can use them. It's called "vetting".
Ah, how quickly the narrative turns. www.thenational.scot/news/2589231...
Narrator: she was not, in fact, taking about the present and the influence that Israel has had on America
Not sure about the Rohirrim, not seeing any pictures in the portfolio, but he definitely TT this about some other characters
In most North American legal/policy contexts, it's a nice neat "anyone pre-Columbian" filter, no need to work with competing indigenous claims. The International Labor Organization definition for some reason leans towards this mindset.