Brandon Bishop
@brandontbishop
Seismologist, investigates the Andes and subduction zones, currently complexly affiliated with St. Louis University and looking for new projects. Replies to my geoscience posts that include LLM content get your account blocked.
This is all sitting under this title, which you'd think would, like, present *evidence*of something, but doesn't; and a paragraph about industrial espionage (totally different thing!) and about how China is "probably" the country doing the most to collect information on US academic research.
This leads into a very odd paragraph that seems to realize it's trying to build an "enemy within" narrative and realize that that's bad, but still kind of wants to build that narrative.
Report writers apparently don't know enough about China to know it's the *Century* of Humiliation, not *Centuries* of Humiliation and a contested bit of propaganda within China. I also have no idea what the point of this paragraph is--people generally don't think their society is evil?
This bit assumes the average American won't cooperate with police or federal agents and that every Chinese citizen is an unwitting intelligence asset or worse. Also no one appears to have, like, talked to Chinese researchers (I can guarantee they're not thinking about the National Intelligence Law)
This bit is, even prior to the present situation in the US, kind of fucking hilarious. "My God! The Chinese state is involved with the Chinese state! They also don't have a federal system *gasp!*"
This is not how normal faulting works. And the authors (redacted, but affiliations are Stanford and USGS Menlo Park) should know better.
Like the topographic profile (white line in last image) screams normal fault footwall and tilting to me, likely accentuated by erosion.
Cranking up the topographic palette to highlight things, there's a couple of things superimposed here. One is set of three slightly east of north volcanic centers, the middle one of which forms the eastern side of the elevated topography.
Ok, Mt. Mazama is circled here in blue, an eroded volcanic center I think is Yamsay is circled in green, does the thing in blue have a name? The presence of eroded (monogenic?) eruptive centers is probably not important there (they're all over) but quasi-circular topo bound by faults is weird.
This is not an exaggeration. www.energy.gov/cmm/what-are... Note that Molybdenum, despite being vitally important to alloying is still not listed.
And same assumptions (plus stopping Sierra Nevada block motion prior to San Andreas start up) gives this at ~60 million years ago. Just rotating the Coastal Block (which is actually an accreted terrane...) gives you the Columbia Embayment and a massive STEP Fault, & pretty understandable tectonics.
Assuming constant rotation rate and translation rates in the last 17 million years gives this map just prior to the start of the Columbia River Flood Basalts. No attempt has been made to restore the Olympic Peninsula or farther north. Things fit quite well.
Like 70 degrees of rotation around the modern Oregon Coast-North America pole or rotation is *huge*! Would vaguely restore into the Cretaceous subduction zone's position for the Idaho's Challis Volcanic Arc, I guess, and the Columbia Embayment.
USGS catalogs are not perfect for earthquakes less than magnitude 4, but even magnitude 4 earthquakes will outline the zone of aftershocks reasonably well--terminates at Caracas. Large fault scarps (if that's what they are) like those in the article would usually require significant earthquakes.
They did it! They actually did it! They annotated the Hydration Break! #hydrationbreak
Watching World Cup matches as they were meant to be: on the vertical component of an accelerometer and annotated by a seismic analyst.
Doing the same thing from station RCBR in Brazil (simple geology(?), distance of 36.33 degrees) gives this record. Similar story here, a large arrival comes in 39 seconds after the foreshock's P-arrival and marks a change in frequency content--presumably this is the 2nd event.
Picking at random station FFC in Canada (simple geology, distance of 51.56 degrees) gives the record below. There is a change in frequency content a bit before 39 seconds post-foreshock P-wave arrival, just before some very large amplitude arrivals come in, that could plausibly be the second event
The bigger context of the tectonic mess of northern South America--essentially everything from the Gulf of Guayaquil in Ecuador to Caracas in Venezuela is moving towards the northeast/east relative to the center of South America as part of the North Andean Sliver. from here: doi.org/10.1093/gji/...
Another week, another update to the abysmal National Science Foundation funding numbers for geoscience. Total of 164 geo grants awarded this year, 25.6% of the pre-Trump average. source: grant-witness.us/funding_curv...
True, but the point of these is to try to capture end members and focus on snapshot structural view (hence in part the classic Chilean vs Marianas type localities of Uyeda and Kanamori). Figure from: agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
My procrastination while thinking about subduction zones yields (1:1 scaled) results! The primary structural features of an ocean-continent subduction zone, from the trench through the arc and fold-thrust belt, to the foreland basin system and craton.
Headline: "Community Outreach and Participation in Tourist Cenotes" K'inich Janaab' Pakal from the afterlife: "Yes. Hahaha. Yes!"
The human ear is a really shitty seismometer--just *look* at this frequency response. From here, which some people should *really* be reading: hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Ph4060...