Colm Murphy
@colmpm
Historian of UK and ROI politics and political economy. Senior Lecturer at QMUL and Deputy Director of Mile End Institute ( Book on Labour and 'modernisation' (
Also, I am very sympathetic to this argument, which tracks what I tried to argue in my own book, albeit more on policy, political economy, and strategy than comms.
Thanks! That comes from this piece I did for @renewaljournal.bsky.social in 2022 as a postdoc. The final line was that (if Starmer secured a "stable and enduring" government) "then perhaps the constant mercury poisoning since 2010 will have been worth it after all." renewal.org.uk/articles/kei...
I do wonder if Reform have actually thought about how they would enforce this in the six counties.
Quite a concentration of drive-by shootings condensed into one paragraph by Geoff Mulgan. www.compassonline.org.uk/wp-content/u...
This is a great piece on the problems and insights of Tom Nairn's writings about globalisation later in life, by James Stafford: doi.org/10.1093/tcbh... It includes this wonderful artefact from a bygone era.
All this looks good, I suppose, but I do hope there is a chunky scene that definitively sets out whether Book 1 or Chapter 12 is the true source of insight that one should draw from The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.
I hope Hull History Centre won't mind me sharing this lovely letter from Roy Hattersley's papers, on the sad news of his passing aged 93. RIP.
Here is a quick snap from the @mileendinstitute.bsky.social event last night - damning evidence of my addiction to scare quotes.
There are many reasons to criticise Starmer's party, and it was certainly an incoherent project. But to describe the economic policy of a government that has increased borrowing by £100bn and passed the Employment + Renters Rights Acts in this way is risible. www.newstatesman.com/politics/lab...
We should view these reports - Tribune and LGG, Haigh-Yang and Curtis - as indicative of the kind of economic policy arguments candidates may have in any leadership election.
For May Day, I chose some appropriate reading for the tube this morning: @renewaljournal.bsky.social's latest special issue on the politics of work. renewal.org.uk/journal/volu...
Pleased that the @ippr.org Progressive Review's special issue on 'abundance', edited by @carsjung.bsky.social, is currently open access. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/25732331... My essay has been described as "satisfyingly blunt realism". See if you agree: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Reading a difference-in-difference analysis of the effect of mass warfare on taxes. It's fascinating, but, due to its method, unintentionally (?) hilarious. "Another potential concern ... is the possibility that countries select into the war based on its anticipated impact on progressive taxation"
The obvious follow up question: why did he sign off the letter in the first place then?
This is a fascinating looking paper by @benjamin-bland.bsky.social, on processes of racialisation in the popular culture of late C20th Britain. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
My latest article is out in British Politics. I try to account for the distressed confusion gripping the UK government's economic strategy. In honour of the article's namesake, I include a tortured football analogy. It's free to read (open access) here. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
There are fascinating nuggets in this report on Britain's Political Party Members (co-authored by QMUL's @timbale.bsky.social). The chart of different party members' responses to "I am proud of my country's history" is going straight into my lectures. esrcpartymembersproject.org/wp-content/u...
Between the postwar period and the 1970s, sterling went from about 80% to about 10% of globally disclosed foreign exchange reserves. (Daunton, 2023, p.432) The former number is inflated by the Second World War and the unique conditions that generated, but that really is an enormous change.
I'm skimming through my own book for something tomorrow (an odd experience). Mordred has decided to start eating it.