theHigherGeometer
@highergeometer
rimcræftiga bespoke constructions in categorified geometry since 2010 dude [bridged from on the fediverse by ]
I really want to understand this (from https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0431), so I can look at its restriction to s(u(2)xu(3)) in f_4, where this Lie subalgebra corresponds to say even the "standard" inclusion due to Todorov–Dubois-Violette, surveyed in https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15235
Is someone about to get a year-long holiday from the arXiv? cc @arXiv
I was really happy when I figured out how to define natural number division like this, the recipes I'd seen were very much more mathematical, in that they just gave a recursive formula, and it took a bit of trial and error to figure out I needed the […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Even just from this snippet preview, I *knew* who the author was, before I even realised the snippet of a url gave a big clue....
I suspect whoever wrote this Wikipedia sentence didn't use the words in the way I think they should mean. What does is mean for a pair of distinct sequences to "be the same algebraically" here? Obviously they are not identical or this transform wouldn't help […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
This paper by my colleague, published last year in Applied Categorical Structures, has had its formatting mangled. Apart from repeatedly switching fonts from serif to sans-serif bold after a diagram in proof environments, the last proposition's statement is […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Sometimes I still can't believe I once pulled off this proof, hard analysis not being my forté
Even in 2003's Sets for Mathematics (Lawvere and Rosebrugh) we see the same treatment of the fixed point theorem without cartesian closedness. I don't have access to a copy of the original edition of Conceptual Mathematics from the 90s, to check if its like this in there also, but I suspect so.
PSA Lawvere knew his eponymous fixed-point theorem was better stated *without assuming cartesian closedness*, in contrast to his paper in the 1960s (reprinted in 2006 in TAC). Here's part of pages 304 and 306 in Conceptual Mathematics, the second edition from 2009:
I think the definition here is wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermanifold#Concrete:_as_a_smooth_manifold it claims the "one-dimensional space of Grassmann numbers" are essentially given by the exterior algebra on a countably infinite-dimensional vector […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Nice to be coming back to this question after a decade, when I claimed something similar was true in much more generality, based only on a feeling, in discussion with Dorette Pronk. Perhaps I was overambitious, but this case seems doable. And will give a […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
A work colleague told us in a meeting today about the concept of 'ghost Sets' in SET, which are triples of pairs of cards ((c1,c2),(d1,d2),(e1,e2)) such that the three cards giving extensions of each given pair into a Set (i.e. the third point on the line in […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Hilbert, by Constance Reid. A great book, showing David Hilbert's passage from a bold young and ambitious mathematician to an old man surrounded by the ruin of the mathematics department in Göttingen in the 1930s. This helped me place a lot of names of […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
The Legend of Sigurd and Gudrún, by J.R.R. Tolkien (edited by Christopher Tolkien) This is Tolkien's adaptation/telling of the matter of the Volsungs and the aftermath with the Huns, to bridge a most unhappy lacuna in the main source text for the Icelandic […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
The Sage of King Heidrek the Wise, by Christopher Tolkien. This was the published version of Christopher's graduate thesis (he did a B.Litt. degree, roughly equivalent to a research masters in literature) that did a critical translation and edition of the […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
J.R.R. Tolkien's The Silmarillion, by Rhona Beare. Beare was an academic, a lecturer in classics in Newcastle here in Australia, and when younger had a correspondence with Tolkien in the 1950s and 60s. One of her questions led to the correction to the 2nd […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Little ol' physics student not-yet-higher geometer making his first foray into constructing interesting examples (well, here it was a counterexample to a naive application of the formalism of Bouwknegt–Evslin–Mathai that applied to principal U(1)-bundles with […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Lawrence Lessig ( @lessig ) eat your heart out. Well, one might argue about Farmer's Union, but patriotism demands I acknowledge it as the state cold drink. (This was posted by a specific politician elsewhere, but I'm removing the attribution because I think […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
From bad AI maths papers on the arXiv to terrible AI Tolkien videos on YouTube... The title here is a mashup of three different books: the 1977 published Silmarillion, the 2007 standalone novel The Children of Húrin (massively expanding the story in chapter […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
From @alexcorner I both love and respect this result ... but so much meme potential. "...and [Gurski]".
This paper was covered 1] in Scientific American [https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01820 - a quantitative version of Faltings' Theorem/Mordell Conjecture. Obviously take it with the caution needed for a preprint, but this is huge if true […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Pigs have flown.... (Paper was on the arXiv in September 2022)
First time I've seen a mathematics paper acknowledge the ONI. I know in the US you get/got a lot of cool pure maths funded by AFOSR, but here it's basically just the ARC in my experience so far. I cautiously say that I'm glad if there's another potential […] [Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
Fun discussion involving @tao about Lean security vulnerabilities (more at link) https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/423402-PrimeNumberTheorem.2B/topic/LeanCert.20for.20numerical.20log.20bounds.20.28re.3A.20PNT.23892.2C.20PNT.23914.29/near/572854830