ipsquiggle
@ipsquiggle
My cozy village builder, Brick & Bramble! 🌱 Father, tinkerer, game developer. I post about about making, programming, dreams, homeschooling, electronics, life logging, meditation, procgen, and urbanism.
I always thought the SimCity SNES cover was so rad. THE. SKYSCRAPERS. ARE. LETTERS. 😱
Some magic line was crossed today and suddenly I actually spent a bit of time "playing" my SimCity remake, and not just debug-poking it. #indieDev
UGH I hate this framing so much. Apple App Store really seemed to cement it with its charts as primary discovery mechanism and it's driven me bananas since. The idea, "lots of people are spending money on this so you should spend money on it too!" feels deeeeply twisted to me. "Buy what's popular!"
#unicycle day 11. I can mount 19 times out of 20, and go in a straight line basically until I run out of road. First attempts at intentional turning have been a moderate success, as shown by the three quarters of a U-turn here.
And if it was just like, `curl`-ing the url I was visiting with a numeric code or something, I'd be like, okay, I get it. But it wants me to run THIS? Like how the hell can I trust that? 🤣 (If someone wants to tell me that this is indeed a hack and the site has been compromised, I'd feel better!)
Uh, ran into this captcha today. This is... EXTREMELY not okay???? Am I missing something?
Ugh, this notification just popped up. I'm so tired of everything advertising to me.
Waaaaoooh the C64 version of Sim City 😍 This is so COOL (via the extremely interesting gamehistory.org/simcity/)
Looking at these diagonal grooves in the door floor plate on the SkyTrain. They are quite deep, like 3mm. They are slipped towards the midpoint of the door. I wonder if the intention is to guide feet/objects *into* the train, if they get caught in a closing door.
Unicycle day 7: after about 45 minutes of falling, I finally clicked on a piece of advice I got early on: to always mount falling forward, like you're already rolling. It turns out stopping and catching your balance from this is easy, but getting going from still is hard!
Okay! Starting the next one! I'm very excited to read this! It's always mentioned everywhere and was the top rec when I asked for urbanism books. And hooeee is it stout! 585 pages!! I'm simultaneously thrilled that it's serious, but also intimidated. Wish me luck!
Finished the book! In the end I didn't learn much, but it would probably be a good primer for a young person just stepping into this mess! I really appreciated its values framing and wish it had pushed more in that direction. It feels fruitful and different than much of what I see about this.
Protest!! The last half of this book is about how to change things, and this top panel is a nice summary of the last few chapters, about changing the system from within. I do feel like it misses a very obvious mechanism, which is voting/citizenship, but still a nice list.
Huh. The argument is against advertising being a deductible expense. Because it "takes" public time, attention, and space to advertise, it should be taxed instead! That strikes me as overly simplistic and probably punative to smaller players but... My friends can attest: I loathe advertising 🤣
Neat, another take on the same idea: a few pages back the book put forward the idea that "money is time", and this takes that thinking to its logical conclusion. Back when I was researching co-ops, the idea that "a person's time is the most valuable thing they can give" really struck me.
I've come across this idea of "local currencies" before, it seems incredibly subversive in a delicious way! There's a good research tangent there...
This is an interesting point about "privatization": that if you are in a one provider/one user market, it's simply a monopoly. I think this is often the case when government functions get privatized.
Every time the Americans in my online dad group discuss parental time off, I get incandescent with rage on their behalf... But I assumed I was just a lucky one! I didn't realize paid maternity leave was so universal!
I think about values a lot but I've never studied them. This representation is really interesting! I've seen this kind of "oppositional pairing" for rights, but not values. I love this stuff!