JB_AU
@jbau
Aussie queer dude. 30 something. Nintendo. Politics. Butts. Photography. Cheerleader for proud nerds and good causes.
Also lol - you don’t make up your own mind. You ask ChatGPT. Wealth rots brains. AI infects the rotted brains further.
Funny how Dave Hughes throws all of his former colleagues under the bus 13 years after the fact and then complains when one of his industry colleagues brings up something historical/gross he did.
The current AI industry dick measuring contest is “Hey our product is just as irresponsible and evil as everyone else’s…in fact that’s the intention! Please look at how good at being evil we are while we pretend to be “warning” you”
Wow, a singer mixed notes with emotions. SO INSIGHTFUL. All of the generic AI slop markers:
For fuck’s sake - how can you say in the same article that AI is an “excellent research tool” while in the paragraph before describing it actively making things up about tax law. That would make it a HORRIBLE research tool. “Excellent” research tools don’t MAKE SHIT UP.
It’s fitting that this reads like it was written by AI or by PR reps at AI companies…and I’m actually not sure which is worse.
“Positive social impact” of the big 4 consulting firms is the definition of an oxymoron lol www.smh.com.au/business/wor...
Telling that the Sydney Morning Herald/Nine only considered qwhite the choice of candidates.
Locking kids out of the cleaning cupboard threatens to hold them back from drinking delicious bleach: WaPo board.
Banning tobacco advertising was one of the most effective public health measures we’ve ever implemented. Now Meta actively encourages you to search for branded reviews of cigarettes with Meta AI helpfully informing you of the “full-bodied bold tobacco flavour” of a “limited release”.
Amazing how private schools rorting funds intended to improve the lives and wellbeing of disabled students gets turned into a sob story about them being “stripped” of funding.
Gonna take a wild guess that the record company didn’t want to pay for a real photographer’s actual photo, so turned it into AI slop to avoid paying them 🫠
See the thing about our “both sides” world of media and journalism is we only get a distillation of a centrist + hard right perspectives. “Mixed reaction” is a mixed reaction of the loudest vested interests.
The photographers somehow manage to get the “shit-eating grin” down pat every time. Though I guess with techbros photographers have an easy task if that’s the aim…
Right. So 40% don’t actually understand or care about negative gearing at all and a loud, wealthy minority are constantly being handed a megaphone to whine about not being able to avoid tax as easily.
How do you become a “data journalist” and not know that AI will make up and hallucinate data on your behalf? Seriously, how do you get a job title like that and make a mistake like that?
Jesus fucking Christ we have mid-paragraph, in-text ads in articles now? At this point, burn the internet down. It’s done. The constant pop ups and flashing ads distracting in every article was one thing but now even single sentences can’t be spared from embedded ads?!?!
I need to again remind American tech companies that America is not the centre of the world. I did not need 10 notifications this morning about a basketball match in America. Also you’re supposedly building genius superintelligent AI but can’t figure out that I’m an Australian with no interest in 🏀?
Photographer: Yeah, give me a real smarmy born to rule look. The editorial team will fake some quotes that pretend you care about society and then my job is to get photos that achieve the opposite. This is my 10th job today.
But but but the Financial Review is posting 30 articles a day about how any taxation or regulation Australia does will destroy startups and “innovation”…
Having $17k lying around to waste on a billboard isn’t the argument for “please tax me less” that you think it is.