Joel S.
@joelhs
Professor of Religion and Jewish Studies, Sarah Lawrence College. PhD in Religious Studies, University of Chicago. Globalist Elite, Ruthless Cosmopolitan, and Thing-in-Itself-hating Jew. Husband of @petticoatshrink.bsky.social. He/Him/הוא/ער
The global far-right is so intertwined in the same online spaces that the Hindutva right is now using George Soros as a bogeyman, assuming their audience will understand, even in a place without a history of the rootless cosmopolitan Jew as a particular Other. It’s a globalized anti-globalist.
The former director of Mossad would be deemed antisemitic according to the IHRA definition of antisemitism.
More politicians should make decisions based on augury. Watch bird migration patterns to determine your tax plan. Observe the feeding patterns of chickens to develop your housing policy. Choose which cities get new development based on where vultures land.
Hannah Arendt did not get everything right - her writings on Black civil rights in the United States are embarrassing - but when she was right, she was right, and she sure was right about Zionism.
Takes some chutzpah for pro-Israel influencers to deploy Hannah Arendt to dismiss non-Zionist Jews, given that if Arendt were writing today, they would unquestionably be calling her self-hating and deracinated for her critiques of Israel and Zionism.
The problem with Citizens United is that it allows wealthy people to influence elections unduly through spending. The problem is not that some of those people might be dual citizens. This is just braindead nativism.
I see we’re just literally doing “Judeo-Bolshevism” again but with Muslims this time.
I'm sure these people see themselves as being on opposite sides politically, but they're both making the same essential argument - the idea that Israel-Palestine needs to be the lens through which to view every conflict worldwide, so Ukraine can't possibly be treated differently for a good reason.
If you replaced “Muslim” with “Jew” here, this would be almost verbatim something from “Der Stürmer.”
I've seen this comparison before. "You wouldn't hire a right-wing Black Studies scholar who defended Jim Crow laws to lead a Black Studies program, so why hire an anti-Zionist scholar to lead a Holocaust center?" The issues with the comparison are two...
There is a certain kind of anti-Zionist out there who really hates that Abdul El-Sayed's form of anti-Zionism is not, in fact, motivated by antisemitism.
Ben Shapiro probably does not know enough history to even know this, but the way he is talking about Muslims as a nation within the nation who can never be integrated is almost verbatim what European nationalists said about Jews in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
We got the first "El-Sayed won Rochester Hills because he's a Zionist" take in the wild.
El-Sayed did not “minimize the attack” on a Michigan synagogue. He said it was ethically and legally indefensible and emphasized that we can understand the context without condoning - which is also how I feel about Israeli genocide in Gaza after 10/7/2023.
I don't think every form of anti-Zionism is antisemitism but I do think this is antisemitism, and I really wish someone else besides this person would be the test case under UK law for whether anti-Zionist beliefs are protected beliefs for the purpose of employment.
This is actual antisemitism - not because it’s criticizing Israel, but because it attributes agency over all migration to Israel, with no evidence. This is just the Great Replacement conspiracy, and it is ultimately far-right. Such conspiracism is going to destroy the left, if it isn’t policed.
What does this even mean, other than just "nationalism?" (www.cnn.com/2026/08/03/p...) I don't actually think it's good for anyone if "Zionism" becomes the generic term for "nationalism," rather than one specific use case of it.
Today we observe Porajmos (Roma Holocaust) Remembrance Day. on the night of 2–3 August 1944, 2,897 Roma were murdered at the Zigeunerfamilienlager at Auschwitz-Birkenau. We remember them and the half a million Sinti and Roma murdered by Nazi Germany and fascist collaborators. Na Bistaren.
Leftists support migrants because they believe a human being's worth should not be dependent on where they were born. Some people who consider themselves part of "the left" are actually just reactionary nationalists of the subaltern class, who would instantly be on the right if their side ever won.
High-level politicians of Germany's far-right, neo-Nazi adjacent AfD are blaming Moroccan immigrants to Spain's Ceuta last week on Israel. Progressives should ask whether they want to acquiesce to an ultimately far-right framing of migrants as "invaders," just because it lets them blame Israel.
There are so, so many good reasons to criticize Israel harshly, but when you've found yourself arguing "Morocco is more European than Spain, which is really part of the Global South," you've lost the plot. Israel is very bad, but it is not responsible for every evil around the world.
Jewish organizations like the ADL that went all in on working with the Trump administration to shut down campus pro-Palestine activism have no idea what is coming.
This is from the editor of the "Economist," and with all due respect, I do not think this is a surprising conflict at all. It's just typical fascist reactionary modernism, going back to Marinetti and the Italian Futurists.
“USAID is why rap music is popular” has to be one of the wilder right-wing conspiracy theories I’ve heard. I’m not exactly sure how, but somehow I’m guessing the Jews are involved in this one.
Congratulations to a major public university for hiring this guy for your new civics center. The civics center is working as it was intended to work, I guess.
There’s some wonderful Schadenfreude in watching pro-Israel right-wing Jews gradually come to realize Trump was never actually any more committed to their cause than to any other, and would sell them out the moment it became expedient to do so.