Michael Karanicolas
@karanicolas
Palmer Chair in Law and Public Policy at Dalhousie Law. Formerly @ UCLA and Yale. All things tech and democracy. Dachshund enthusiast.
I also can't help but notice how the plan for universities involves more hiring, with lower tuition and less donations. 🙃
It's telling how the advocates of this plan call for institutional neutrality and the avoidance of political controversy on one hand, while simultaneously demanding that hiring processes explicitly be tilted in favor of right wing applicants. Everyone connected with AAU should be deeply ashamed.
"DO YOU KNOW ANY CREATIVE OR UNCONVENTIONAL WAYS TO PRESSURE AND PUNISH IRAN??"
Nightmare fuel. Though at least we can look forward to how goofy the characters are going to look in their historically accurate armour.
Love how the SCOTUS Justices insist they are careful and neutral interpreters of law and tradition, while Trump himself is crowing about how this is the biggest unprecedented expansion of executive power in a century.
I know it's not the main point here but wtf is he talking about AirBNB is illegal in New York? Dude's just spouting off nonsense.
The author notes the risk of abuse, but doesn't fully grapple with how great a force-multiplier this would be to current efforts by the Trump administration to suppress critical reporting. Recall what @mmfa.bsky.social just went through, and imagine every NGO in the US facing this kind of process.
The author cites the BBC & CBC, but there are dozens of examples of robust public media, and a well-established body of standards for preventing these from becoming a propaganda arm: a public service mandate, independent editorial board, funding guarantees, etc. There's books written about this.
To me, the most valuable context to the UCLA fracas is: FedSoc were in violation of content neutral speaker policies. The administration bent over backwards to accommodate them anyway, and now they're being trashed on Fox News for it. There's a lesson here for how you engage with bad faith actors.
A growing number of countries are considering measures to block youth access to social media or other digital content. Today, the Information Policy Lab is launching a Report on the tradeoffs age verification offers for privacy, freedom of expression and child protection: cdn.dal.ca/content/dam/...
I mostly agree with this article, but I feel the conclusion below misreads the moment we're in. The world's democracies have barely been interested in mustering a defence against technologically-enabled authoritarianism for the past decade: there is zero appetite for picking a fight with China now.
It's a short clip, and I don't know what led up to this moment. But it seems pretty clear President Kotlikoff was lying in his version of what happened. This is not maneuvering around where there's space: the student was directly behind the car when he started accelerating.
Excited to head to Zambia for #RightsCon 2026! I'll be speaking on a few panels, including on press freedom and disability inclusion with @alinaradu.bsky.social and partners from Human Rights Reporters Ghana: humanrightsreporters.com/human-rights...
Straight from the horse's mouth: the destruction is the point. Force them to spend all their energy and resources on rebuilding critical infrastructure, and they won't have any capability to build anything else. It's the Gaza strategy all over again.
This "diplomatic tightrope" language strains credulity. Are we really meant to believe Canada's situation vis-a-vis the U.S. is more precarious than, say, Barbados or Guyana? Call a spade a spade: Carney supports these strikes because his view of the region aligns with Trump's.
Just randomly realized that the reason Dunk is so reluctant to knight Raymun Fossoway is because Ser Arlen never really knighted him, so Raymun would never be a real knight (and neither would anyone Raymun ever knighted… or anyone they knighted in turn….).
Yeah just one small problem with that otherwise perfect plan.
In discussing the detainees, the lawyer also says: "I am not white, as you can see. And my family's at risk as any other people that might get picked up too, so I share the same concern, and I took that concern to heart." Cannot fathom how a lawyer can express that and just keep going in to work.
Today, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Open Government Partnership. While unsurprising, this move is another nail in the coffin of America's global leadership, with particular regards to democracy and open government principles. www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/u...
I have my criticisms of Canadian speech policy - in particular related to the Combatting Hate Act, which I view as an unacceptable retreat from core constitutional values. But even here, the situation in the U.S. is vastly worse, where writing the wrong op-ed can get you jailed and deported.
There's a lot to pick apart here, but this line, from an American, is especially galling. I teach at a law school. And unlike many of my colleagues south of the border, I can do that without a government apparatchik picking through my syllabus in search of wrongthink. Land of the free it ain't.
It makes perfect sense once you understand the problem with Maduro was never his authoritarianism, just like it’s not a concern for el-Sisi in Egypt or any of the Gulf royals. So if his VP is willing to start waving an American flag, why wouldn’t they embrace her?