Keegan Lannon
@keeganlannon
PhD: Aberystwyth; Work: UI-Chicago. I twee—er, post (skeet?)—about all things that fall under the auspices of an English department, but especially comics, writing, and teaching (mainly about comics and writing).
Five paragraphs in, the authors spends four consecutive paragraphs explaining how the conservatives are just looking to ensure state funds are spent appropriately and presents a few quotes from the architects of the model legislation. The article provides no context for the quotes.
I coach my kids’ soccer and baseball teams, and that gives me great joy. But signing up my kids for their first MarioKart tournament is a whole other level of happiness.
Look at this from Politico. You can find pictures of these very public figures where they don’t look like they are living their best lives.
Listen, Fox News producers, if you are going to have someone on who says “look at these images coming out of New York…” you might not want to juxtapose his grim warnings about socialism with three pictures of smiling happy people. If you are going to engage in agitprop, do it well.
I’m most annoyed by this forcing me to reconcile the fact that 2004 was 22 years ago. We are as far away from Season 3 of Scrubs, as S3 of Scrubs was from S3 of Magnum PI.
I'm going to start point to this whenever I see this dudes name cross my feed.
This is part of the value of including people who think about language and communication: they bring a necessary nuance to the discussion. A tool designed to extract sentiment from consumer reviews is not going to be good at extracting political sentiments or emotional arcs.
Today's article on sentiment analysis is already off to a better start, and one of the key differences between this and other sentiment analysis articles is that one of the two researchers studies communications. This is an important distinction about what is being measured.
See...this is a problem. This is from a write-up of the experiment in The Atlantic:
The authors admit that downloads don't necessarily equate to success (left undiscussed is that Project Gutenberg is a collection of works out of copyright; so downloading these text aren't really tied to commercial success), but there is something interesting in this data.
Yowza, this is inscrutable, which is not the fault of the authors here. This was published in a data science journal, so I am assuming this all makes sense to someone. I'm not even sure where to begin to figure out what this means...
I kind of feel like if I sought to prove that the universality of anything in data analytics is a settled theory, and I referenced a TED Talk as the example of people discussing that theory, the data science people would raise their hands with some fairly righteous questions.
Irony, sarcasm, metaphor: Natural Language Processing has long struggled with this. Humans, especially in artistic expression, use words in contradictory ways. Just look at this KC Green cartoon. What the dog is expressing is not what the reader feels. But also, what is the emotional arc here?
See: evoking emotions is...complicated. I am very interested in the "simple, robust" sentiment analysis tool they used, including how they label and identify what a reader is meant to feel, how they *determined* what the...correct? approrpriate?...emotional response is?
In both SHRINKING and THE FOUR SEASONS, Vernée Watson was cast as a mother of a main character with ailing health who resists moving in with her adult child, which is a very niche typecasting.
I went to see if I could snag cheap seats to the Jimmy Eat World show tomorrow and I feel like this guy isn’t trying too hard to sell his seats.
Some pictures for my fifth talk as part of my summer residency for Lectures on Tap. It was a fun time and there were a lot of great questions.
The High Septon/Elvis Impersonator who marries Sansa and Tyrion. Good side burns in this show.
I know it’s not the worst thing about this map, but why are all the bubbles so differently sized.
*steps to mic* *taps to ensure it’s on* *clears throat* “fuuuuuuuuck youuuuuuuu”
This video of Local H does not properly represent how egregiously loud the band was. A killer performance, but just so loud.