I would argue both are exceptional passers of the ball. But on possession and defending, Anderson is in a different league. He's the natural successor to Rodri and one of a tiny number of players who can play 6 solo: defending, progressing and carrying. Jones can play 6 in a pair or 8

Anderson is a unicorn... already the best 6 in the Prem. Here's the side-by-sides (data per 90, last season). Anderson on the left, Jones on the right Jones marginally better at shooting, but neither especially good. Jones has better xA, but Anderson better A. Other passing stats good for both

Surely several... top 4% might have been harder back in the day with mostly interested players and not much external content feels like easier now with loads of casuals and 1-GW teams?

if you see this post your mentor.

Worth reading carefully if you have access. Core to this is a decline in women's desire to climb the corporate ladder. Many possible reasons, obviously Interesting to note Britain with the smallest pay gap of comparators

'kinell

And states pretty clearly that NI is a PAYG system, not a personal pension contribution

B) You might be making a surplus today, but if you stand still in headwinds, you'll be making a loss tomorrow. Cut now and you need to make fewer cuts later. And you can see this dynamic in Exeter's accounts 14/ www.exeter.ac.uk/v8media/univ...

The article says why the cuts are coming: mgmt wants staff costs below 55% of revenue. One might not like that argument, but it's as clear as any rationale could be 10/

and modestly declining demographics domestically, which show a ~10% fall from the 25-29 cohort to the 15-19 cohort... 2/ www.statista.com/statistics/7...

Not far off...

For those that think the 14th amendment might in some way be ambiguous

So I wrote this, paraphrased: "some baby, some bathwater" You can identify a infinite number of 'baby' cuts without disproving that point.

This chart implies it was at historic lows in 2011 and has climbed slowly since... 2/

Or this article which identifies 'local opposition' and 'bureaucracy' stopping the plan www.bluechainconsulting.com/post/running...

Reading now - this is the key point. If you want investment, ultimately customers / taxpayers have to pay for it. Public or private, this is true. Because of the regulatory regime this is down to politicians. 1/

In which this word salad is quoted approvingly Moronic.

For example, Greens and Reform voters are quite similar on their views of institutions

If this was true, we would see it in polling data and by-election data. We just don't. Polling data from here: www.pollcheck.co.uk/polls/green-... 3/

Indeed. Spanking Saudi Arabia is not demonstrating that they're a good team, any more than drawing with Cape Verde with these data proved they were poor

In which this is an interesting passage, which - as I read it as a non-statto - says the heritability of cognitive performance is very high (0.75) but of educational attainment (years of education) to be insignificant 2/

A wealth tax on billionaires is completely different. Firstly, a wealth tax is on lifetime assets, not this year's income. Take the example from the TPA site: 2/

If you use the top 10%, it's like this. Clearly some overlap, but compare Sweden, Ireland, Canada, for example. Is Sweden experiencing societal and environmental collapse? Is Canada? 4/

For example, if you define extreme inequality as the personal wealth of the top 1%, the map looks like this: 3/

Got pretty much what the model expected (very mild bad luck) #FPL

Long way off your rank, but a good green arrow on the season nonetheless #fpl

Given the rate of teenage pregnancy has almost halved in England since 1998, he's also describing a tiny niche of the country Maybe he just needs to get out more.

Or this from the OECD www.oecd.org/content/dam/... 5/

...which says this 4/

...which says this: "We find that home-ownership is a constraint for the employed and public renting is more of a constraint for the unemployed" 2/