Chris Sardo
@mcsardo
Recovering political theorist, current history/government teacher, long-suffering Sabres fan. Politics, pedagogy, music, Sabres, and other sad things. He/his.
Look I'm not saying this isn't problematic in part, but let's start here instead of having kids make "Pilgrim and Indian" costumes out of paper bags.
For those of you following the College Board's decision to include "core principles" from Adam Smith, and were wondering what exactly they decided were "core principles", the updated "Course and Exam Description" mentions Smith a total of 3 times, with no actual guidance:
@clppng.bsky.social absolutely killed it tonight. I can't think of any other group that would reference William S. Gibson, Ursula K. Le Guin, and Stokley Carmichael in the same set.
Truly cursed set of predictions I made in October when my students looked at some of the important cases that SCOTUS would hear this year (Barbara wasn't on the docket yet, hence why it wasn't included)
I'm sorry but in what world are these even remotely the same type of "weaknesses". Saying God is beyond gender binaries (true) and that there is more than two biological sexes (true-ish) are in no way equivalent to what concerns people about Platner.
The idea, in tonight's order, that it's the district court irresponsibly intervening to change maps on the eve of an election is laughable
Real cool that Scotus can just ignore a 79 page opinion written by a 3 judge panel (including 2 Trump apointees) finding that the Alabama map violated even the standard set by Callais by simply saying..."nope" (gift link) www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/u...
This is a good piece in today's times countering the Bezos/Booker/Porter "cut everyone's taxes mantra: What if we all pay a bit more in taxes so that we can play less for everything else: www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/o...
Ugh. Fed 39 sure, Gettysburg Address yes, Emancipation Proclamation, fine (but not really needed for political science when the reconstruction amendments are required) but Smith is just 🤡
I like the stripped down versions with the live musicians a lot. I saw her live a couple years ago, and she puts on a great show
This is genocidal language, and it demands not only the removal of this President but also a fundamental transformation of the presidency: no one should have the power to unilaterally destroy another civilization.
I'm fairly confident this meets the definition of genocide under the genocide convention
"We repent of the evil that enslaves us, the evil we have done, and the evil done on our behalf."
They're robbing us to kill schoolchildren on the other side of the world. How is this not on the lips of every elected Democrat?
The first paragraph alone is a banger - this should be what every person in education shoul dbe shouting from the rooftops, rather than "let's find ways to encourage hybrid AI writing" or "let's teach AI responsibility" www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/o...
I agree with your general point, but I think the poll actually reveals that the word "zionist" is itself a contested concept, because when you ask other questions, you get very different results in the same poll:
Things like this represent the fundamental flaw with something like @allsidesnow.bsky.social . I get the noble motivation of wanting to show people multiple perspectives, but this isn't actually helpful, as it just shows partisans being partisans (tho Himes actually at least refers to int'l law).
This piece is all really good from @ositanwanevu.com - the grand unifying thesis of the Trump administration - from ICE brutality, to defunding USAID, to attacks on DEI, to its outright imperialism - is the belief that the world is ruled by force alone and that we have no moral ties to anyone else.
They're not even trying to hide the raw imperial ambition here. We have taken over a country and are going to extract profits from it.
Apparently you only have immunity from indictments in the United States if you live in a palace in Palm Beach.
Buried in this piece about rolling out AI in schools is the admission: we literally have no data or findings on the effect of AI use on student learning or well being to guide this implementation. We're literally using our kids as a giant experimental subject. www.nytimes.com/2026/01/02/t...
This year I read or listened to 50 books. Some were good (have an asterisk), some were okay. I learned and thought a lot. My conclusion is everyone should Read More Books.