Bespoke Federal Reserve Exception
@moreyamsterdam
You can trash the country, the Constitution, and democracy, but hands off the economy.
Look, there are lots of things wrong with the DSA, and M4A has no chance of passing in the next two decades (at least). Still, Chait hates both of those so intensely that he's lost the ability to think and write.
Is the antisemitism the means to excuse the rapes, or vice versa? The answer, obviously, is both.
This is on the Reagan Foundation website in bold and large font:
Here's another bizarre section: she completely misrepresents Elizabeth Warren to suggest that two income households *introduce* economic precarity instead of respond to it. That can't be a misreading, so she has to be lying. Also, it was two decades ago, not "many."
Also, the language is peculiar: How large was the cut? "Destruction of delaminating surface material" says the material was *already* delaminating. Who made the report? The whole thing is deliberately evasive.
You don't think the AIPAC splash page is extremist -- or idiotic?
Here's everything you need to know about Rainn Wilson. Tl;dr: he's an idiot.
"People who question the notion of objectivity also believe there's no such thing as evidence. I am not a clown."
"Also, we used AI to determine why the humanities suck."
I love this: "immediate responses are not the most considered, so I ignored the negative ones and read the ones that tell me I'm great." Wilentz has lost several steps.
This is Trump-level stupidity and dishonesty. Absolutely embarrassing from start to finish. open.substack.com/pub/zeteo/p/...
Think about the Dems passing the ACA-- and Trump's three failed attempts to repeal it -- W's failure to put Harriet Miers on SCOTUS, the utter fecklessness of every GOP majority leader (except *maybe* McConnell) and saying "yeah, two guys forced out by their own party were better than Pelosi."
He heard rumors that he had a white supremacist tattoo and didn't connect it to the death's head -- and then he used the "r-word?" He's a clown.
This comes from *one* source and the fourth paragraph admits it’s bullshit:
Yes, let's get down to what politics is really about: mob violence with no elections targeting a Democrat instead of actual fascists. Also:
When the first sentence of your piece disputes a fact and the second sentence is an absurd straw man, you've told me to stop reading.
I gave blood in a VFW last week and the urinals had these in them: