Nonningham

@nonningham

Screaming into the void.

169 Folgt485 Follower2.565 Posts

Bluesky

Ist das dein Profil?Übernimm es — dann gehört dir nonningham.dirty.social.Profil übernehmen

Nonningham@nonningham· 8d

Elon royally fucked SpaceX investors when he used their money to rescue Xitter from xAI. SpaceX would be profitable otherwise.

Nonningham@nonningham· 10d

Do we both? Only one of us here is crafting nuance to justify it.

Nonningham@nonningham· 10d

Sure sounds like you were defending the misguided leftist notion that they were the same.

Nonningham@nonningham· 16d

Nonningham@nonningham· 26d

Trump has been trying to stir up a pretext to rig the 2026 & 2028 elections since the time he entered office. Trump firing those responsible for certifying voting machines last week is likely connected to his latest push to rig the midterms.

Nonningham@nonningham· 27d

Nonningham@nonningham· Jul 13

Conspiracy Against Rights w/ sentencing enhancement for murdering someone in cold blood. Covers a lot more than the murders. All the threats, the kidnapping, the sexual assault. Charge all of it. Homan, Bovino, Miller and every other person in the leadership chain should be facing 1000s of years.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jul 12

Nonningham@nonningham· Jul 1

My bad. You're totally right. Trump would never be caught wearing a silver medal.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jul 1

I'm surprised we've made it this far without him appearing in full military regalia. You know he wants to.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 25

And they're really only getting warmed up.

meme: Homer Simpson comforts a miserable Bart by telling him it is only the worst day of his life "so far." It is used to humorously suggest that a bad situation will likely get even worse.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 24

"Authorities"?! No, the USPS does not have the authority to tamper with ballots no matter what Trump or his bootlickers say. The stance of the Democratic party should be that anyone who interefers in the deliver of ballots will be prosecuted.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 24

Biden 2028

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 21

If it is then Trump was openly plotting a criminal conspiracy to touch the water.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 19

An embarrassment all the way down.

Pete Hegseth putting up a plaque on the Pentagon naming it the "Department of Surrender"

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 13

It's certainly possible but there is, as of yet, no evidence of a plateau. Quite the opposite.

Novel hypotheses in molecular biology. Mythos 5 is our first model to consistently produce novel, compelling scientific hypotheses. In blinded head-to-head comparisons against Opus-class models, our scientists preferred Mythos’s molecular biology hypotheses ~80% of the time, and have advanced several to experimental evaluation. In the meantime, one Mythos hypothesis—a novel mechanism for an E. coli protein—was corroborated in a study from a lab independently working on the same problem.

Novel research in genomics. Mythos 5 conducted novel genomics research in over a week of largely autonomous work. It assembled single-cell data for millions of cells spanning 138 animal species and designed and trained a custom machine learning model to identify cells performing the same role in even distantly related organisms. With only high-level human input, Mythos 5’s trained model outperformed a recent model published in the journal Science—despite being 100 times smaller. We intend to publish these results in the coming months.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 13

1 year ago a team of mathematicians created a math benchmark that no single human could complete. There are few humans alive that could solve any of these problems. It's nearly saturated. Beyond this is the true frontier. Math no human has solved. AI capabilities are progressing, rapidly.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 10

Nope, still wrong. You do not know what you are talking about. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 7

The Jan 6th slush fund is a conspiracy to give aid and comfort to an insurrection. Blanche took steps in furtherance of the conspiracy and then tried to back down. Trump's intent is clear for all to see.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 2

OpenAI and Anthropic have regularly had capacity issues over the past months and had lowered usage caps. There is a very vocal anti-AI bubble but there is also a very large, very active, fast growing user base.

Chart of annual revenue of frontier AI labs. OpenAi and anthropic growing to $24bn and $30bn annual revenue in less than 3 years, most of that growth in 2025.

Nonningham@nonningham· Jun 1

Well thanks for playing. Noting the only proof offered was to run away and hide.

Nonningham@nonningham· May 28

Trump should challenge Iran to settle the war by single combat.

Nonningham@nonningham· May 28

The researchers point out that this could have been solved by humans but likely wasn't because the right person with the right skills and curiosity never happened to look at it. "Most experts [wrongly] believed the conjecture to be true"

When assessing the importance and influence of an AI-generated proof, a question I ask myself
is: has this taught us something new about the problem? Do we understand discrete geometry better now? I think the answer is a moderated yes: this shows that there is a lot more that number
theoretic constructions have to say about these sorts of questions than we suspected; moreover, that
the number theory required can be very deep. No doubt many algebraic number theorists will be
taking a close look at other open problems in discrete geometry in the coming months.
On the other hand, perhaps some in the area will be a little disappointed with how little this
tells us: it does not introduce any powerful new geometric tools, or hitherto unsuspected structural
results, that a proof of the unit distance conjecture would likely have called for. Still, while perhaps
not the proof of a conjecture that we had hoped for, no doubt this construction and the ideas
involved will have a major impact in discrete geometry.
One aspect of this proof should not be overlooked: while the original proof produced by AI was
completely valid, it was significantly improved by the human researchers at OpenAI and the many
other mathematicians involved in the present paper. The human still plays a vital role in discussing,
digesting, and improving this proof, and exploring its consequences.
The frontiers of knowledge are very spiky, and no doubt the coming months and years will
see similar successes in many other areas of mathematics, where long-standing open problems are
resolved by an AI revealing unexpected connections and pushing the existing technical machinery
to its limit. AI is helping us to more fully explore the cathedral of mathematics we have build over
the centuries; what other unseen wonders are waiting in the wings?

Nonningham@nonningham· May 28

I trust it because mathematicians verified and refined the proof. It can write a program to count letters. It's simply not a machine trained to count letters in words natively, and there's no incentive to do that. It's like proclaiming a screwdriver useless because it's a bad hammer.

The solution of the problem by the internal model of Open AI is, in my opinion, an outstanding
achievement, settling a long-standing open problem. The fact that the correct answer is not n
1+o(1)
is surprising, and the construction and its analysis apply fairly sophisticated tools from algebraic
number theory in an elegant and clever way. As explained by the remarks of some of my colleagues
here there are several reasons that explain why AI tools can be better than humans in finding such
a construction. With or without a full agreement with these reasons, the fact is that the AI was
able to do here what lots of excellent human researchers tried and failed to do.
Like other mathematicians who had the opportunity to experiment, even if only briefly in my
case, with ChatGPT Pro 5.5, my impression has been that AI tools are capable of changing research
in mathematics in a dramatic way. The new spectacular solution of the Erdős unit distance problem
convinces me that it is hard to overestimate the full potential impact of this change.

Nonningham@nonningham· May 27

See. Lol!

Nonningham@nonningham· May 21

LLM models have reached the point where they are assisting and solving longstanding mathematics problems that humans have toiled on unsuccessfully for decades. The incentive structure is such that AI research will not stop. openai.com/index/model-...

Nonningham@nonningham· May 18

Trump is a narcissist and an abuser. Even if he recognizes failures, and I'm sure he does, he will never accept any blame. It will always be someone else's fault whether that be his hand picked quisling's incompetence or a dastardly plot to not give him everything he demands he is owed.

Nonningham@nonningham· May 15

Methane also burns blue so it looks cool AF.

Nonningham@nonningham· May 11

Take a scroll through this thread or any other AI thread on Bluesky and you'll find reams of posts claiming AI doesn't actually work.

Nonningham@nonningham· May 9

No, that isn't the word. Criminals desperate in their need for pardons aren't truly loyal. They are thralls. What worries me is how many of them are heavily armed law enforcement.